Auto Enroll Default Should be Increased, Principal Reports

The Principal Financial Group found that plans who start auto-enrollment at a 3% deferral rate have a lower average deferral rate than plans without an automatic enrollment feature.

Client data from The Principal shows that plans with an automatic enrollment feature defaulting at 3% produce an average deferral of 6.3% – lower than the average deferral of 6.8% for plans without an automatic enrollment feature. In contrast, the average deferral is 7.1% for plans that have a 6% default automatic enrollment feature.  

Automatic enrollment significantly boosts participation in retirement plans, the data shows. There was a 20% increase in participation in plans with an automatic-enrollment feature compared to participation in plans without the feature. In addition, automatic enrollment at 6% only increased opt outs by 4 percentage points (19%) over the 3% automatic-enrollment deferral rate (15%). 

Want the latest retirement plan adviser news and insights? Sign up for PLANADVISER newsletters.

“Automatic enrollment is a powerful tool to encourage better retirement savings behavior, but we’ve found that most plan sponsors tend to set their default at what we believe is an insufficient level,” said Barrie Christman, vice president of individual investor services at The Principal.

For plans with an employer match contribution, nearly twice as many participants (61%) reach an overall savings rate greater than 11% when their employers’ plan defaulted them at 6% rather than 3% (32%). Twenty-eight percent of participants in plans with a stated employer match but without automatic enrollment save 11% or more.   

Christman added that implementing an auto-escalate program, which automatically increases participants’ deferral amounts by certain percentages over set amounts of time, along with automatic enrollment is another way for plan sponsors to help participants reach their retirement savings goals. “Our data supports coupling the two programs to achieve the most successful plan design, especially if the automatic enrollment default rate is lower,” she said.

Automated Programs Lead to Improved 401(k) Results

Bank of America Merrill Lynch’s Retirement & Benefit Plan Services quarterly report on plan participant contribution activities found many plan sponsors are using a combination of automated and advice features.

As of March 31, 2011, 12% of plans within BofA Merrill Lynch’s proprietary 401(k) business were utilizing Auto Enrollment and Advice Access, 10% of plans utilize both Auto Enrollment and Auto Increase, and 7% of plans utilize Auto Enrollment, Auto Increase and Advice Access. Its analysis found plans that incorporate multiple features or services designed to encourage positive plan participant behaviors show significantly greater results.  

The average participation rate for plans that don’t use any of the services is 48%, compared to an average participation rate of 64% for plans that incorporate any two services and 76% for plans that include all three.  

For more stories like this, sign up for the PLANADVISERdash daily newsletter.

Year-over-year, BofA Merrill Lynch has seen a 12% increase in the use of Auto Enrollment, with more than 260 plans live with this feature; a 23% increase in the use of Auto Increase, with more than 140 plans now live; a 26% increase in plan usage of Advice Access, with more than 420 plans now live with this service. The analysis also found a 22% increase in participants utilizing Advice Access since March 2010.   

Other findings from the 401(k) Contribution Activities Quarterly Scorecard include:

  • Nearly 291,000 employees took a positive savings action in their 401(k) plan accounts in Q1 2011, compared to approximately 202,000 in Q1 2010.
  • Among all participants who took some type of savings action during Q1 2011, 75% took a positive action (started or increased contributions), versus 25% who took a negative action (stopped or decreased contributions) – compared to 66% and 34% during Q1 2010, respectively.
  • The percentage of plan participants who increased their contribution rate in Q1 2011 was 3 percentage points higher than those who took this action in Q1 2010, while the percentage of participants who started contributing was nearly 6 percentage points higher for the same period. 

«