Atlanta Chemical Firm Joins List of Firms Halting 401(k) Match
An Atlanta-based industrial-cleaning chemicals company became the latest employer to call a temporary halt to its 401(k) match in a cost-cutting drive.
The Atlanta Journal-Constitution reported that in addition to the 401(k) match suspension, Zep Inc.’s chairman will take a 20% salary cut, while 60 senior executives will see a pay and benefit reduction of up to 13%.
John K. Morgan, chairman and chief executive, told the Journal-Constitution that the company’s slump was like a “flu” and that the cost-cutting moves were designed to deal with that reality.
Morgan said he told employees that reinstating the matching contributions to 401(k) accounts is the first priority upon returning to profitability.
On Monday, the company reported a loss of $1.9 million, or $.07 cents per share in the three months ended November 30. Zep, which in December announced a 5% reduction in its non-sales work force — or 45 jobs — in response to the down economy, blamed the loss on that restructuring as well as falling sales and high commodities costs.
By using this site you agree to our network wide Privacy Policy.
A news release from the National Institute on Retirement Security (NIRS), which commissioned the poll, said 83% of respondents were worried they would have to change their retirement plans in light of the slumping economy and investment markets.
Some 71% said retiring today is harder than it was for previous generations, and 51% asserted that the current retirement system is worse than it used to be since more people have to rely on defined contribution programs rather than defined benefit plans.
Asked to define a “secure retirement,” about half said it is having enough money to pay bills or meet basic needs.
“Even before the global financial crisis, the retirement outlook for America was grim,” said Beth Almeida, NIRS executive director, in the news release. “This month, millions of workers and retirees are opening their individual retirement account statements and likely feeling that their retirement aspirations are an unattainable fantasy.”
Other Findings
According to the survey of roughly 800 American workers:
84% think government should make it easier for employers to offer pensions, while 79% think it is a good idea for government to sponsor pension plans that small employers or individuals can join.
87% think it is a good idea to provide tax incentives or other steps to encourage small employers to band together to offer pensions.
65% of workers with a pension are confident it will be there at retirement, while about half of those with 401(k)-type accounts believe they will have enough of a nest egg to stop working.
55% of those without a pension say having a pension would ease their anxiety.
87% believe all workers should have a pension so they can be self-reliant in retirement.
85% agree retirement security is a shared responsibility between individuals, employers, and government.
Sharing Pension Responsibility
The survey’s authors also said that Americans want portability, followed by employer contributions, continuation of benefits for a spouse after death, and a regular check that cannot be outlived. They want to take individual responsibility/control over their retirement savings and trust themselves most, but they tend to be less interested in managing their investments and often say 401(k) savings are a “gamble.” According to a release on the findings, they are also divided as to whether retirement plans should allow loans against retirement savings.
Additionally, respondents said strengthening Social Security is the most important step the new Congress and Administration can take to improve retirement security. Americans also strongly favor tax incentives that would help individuals save for retirement or help employers offer retirement plans—and they are less interested in managing investments.
“Americans value the stability and security provided by a pension, and are experiencing the pitfalls of ‘on your own’ retirement,” Almeida said. “Absent a ‘Pension Renaissance,’ our retirement system will remain inefficient and insufficient—and Americans will continue to feel vulnerable.”