Asset Owners Looking to Use Smart Beta Solutions

The roles assumed by investment managers, consultants and index providers in the evaluation of smart beta vary depending on AUM tiers of asset owners.

According to its third annual global institutional market survey, Smart Beta: 2016 Global Survey Findings from Asset Owners, FTSE Russell confirms that the percentage of asset owners currently evaluating smart beta has more than doubled from 15% at the first survey in 2014 to 36% in 2016, and 62% of asset owners with an existing smart beta allocation are now evaluating additional allocations.

For the purposes of the survey, “smart beta” is defined as an index-based investment strategy that is not traditionally market cap–weighted (i.e., fundamentally weighted, equal weighted, factor weighted, optimized, etc.).

Want the latest retirement plan adviser news and insights? Sign up for PLANADVISER newsletters.

The survey finds the strongest growth in smart beta adoption is among asset owners with less than $1 billion in assets. Return enhancement and risk reduction continue to be the primary objectives for use of smart beta by asset owners; cost savings are more important in 2016 than in years past.

The percentage of asset owners using five or more smart beta indexes increased significantly, from 2% in 2014 to 21% in 2016. While low-volatility and value factor indexes still lead in asset owner implementation, adoption of multi-factor combination indexes has nearly doubled in the last year and is now a close third. And, nearly 70% of asset owners take a long view on smart beta, planning to use smart beta indexes five years or longer to help achieve investment objectives. Smart beta index-based investments are increasingly being considered as part of an active allocation, with 35% considering it an exclusively active strategy, from 22% last year.

NEXT: Vehicles for using smart beta and evaluating smart beta options

Separate accounts are the most preferred vehicle for strategic implementation of smart beta, driven by demand from asset owners with more than $1 billion in assets. For tactical implementation of smart beta, asset owners are using a wide range of vehicles, including internal management of assets, separate accounts, exchange-traded funds (ETFs) and CITs (collective investment trusts).

The roles assumed by investment managers, consultants and index providers in the evaluation of smart beta vary depending on AUM tiers of asset owners. External investment managers are most extensively engaged with asset owners under $1 billion in AUM; consultants with asset owners between $1 billion to $10 billion in AUM; and index providers with asset owners with $10 billion or more in AUM.

“The survey demonstrates accelerating interest in and implementation of smart beta indexes among global institutional asset owners,” says Rolf Agather, managing director of North America research, FTSE Russell. “While many asset owners and consultants have increased their understanding of smart beta, continuing innovations in other asset classes and the multi-factor arena underscore the need for more information and education. We hope the results of the survey provide a degree of insight for all market participants with an interest in smart beta.”

The third annual survey was conducted in January and February 2016. The 253 asset owners included this year (up from 214 last year and 181 in 2014) are drawn from North America (49%), Europe (33%) and Asia (13%). Survey results can be requested from FTSE Russell’s website.

Lessons for Long-Term Investors from Active Stock Pickers

Many DC retirement plan participants have saved large sums without ever actually picking a stock, but that doesn’t mean their advisers can afford to lose touch with the latest market trends. 

Some of the best-performing mutual fund portfolio managers in the business came together for a mini investing summit Wednesday in New York, put on by SunStar Strategic to highlight its money manager clients that have had strong success navigating the market turbulence of the last year.

Following breakfast, a lineup of seven portfolio managers and analysts each made their 10- to 15-minute case for what they see as the most compelling opportunities in the equity markets today. While their opinions ranged in terms of which corners of the markets might do best in coming years, it’s fair to say that they all see compelling evidence for staying broadly invested in equities for the foreseeable future—but also for being increasingly picky about risk amid stubborn global headwinds.

Never miss a story — sign up for PLANADVISER newsletters to keep up on the latest retirement plan adviser news.

Eric Marshall, manager with Hodges Capital Management, focused on making the case for small caps, arguing a “bottoms-up approach makes a lot of sense in the current environment, particularly within the small-cap universe.” He believes the current market turbulence, especially when one zooms in on the difficulties driven directly by major oil price fluctuations,  has caused an increasing amount of inefficiency in the markets, “most notably among small caps that are not as heavily analyzed or closely followed as their larger capitalized counterparts.”

According to Marshall, opportunities range from small southern regional banks with manageable exposures to the oil production sector, which have seen their stock prices perhaps unfairly tarnished, through to companies that will feel a tailwind from the big federal highway funding bill passed last year. 

“At a high level, we have had success from our conviction that we should not try to anticipate or preempt the macroeconomic trends,” Marshall adds. “Instead we look at individual public stocks, and we analyze them almost in the way of a private equity firm sizing up an opportunity. We deploy our research team out into the field to make thousands of points of contact with the managers of the companies we are thinking about investing in. We search out the company’s own clients and suppliers to get their input as well.”

The idea is to really go beyond the equity price and get a handle on the true upside potential versus the downside risk of individual stocks, explains Robert McIver, manager with Jensen Investment Management. Thinking about his own firm, McIver says one way to put this thinking into action is to “think very deeply and critically about the cash flow characteristics of stocks that are going into our portfolio.”

“In our most high-conviction and defensive equity portfolios, for example, we will only admit stocks that have a proven track  record of maintaining very heathy and stable cash flows, even though periods of recession,” he explains. “In terms of actual stocks, this may, for example, favor disposable goods companies that manufacture products that do not see demand fluctuate in line with changes in GDP. There are many ways this thinking can play out, but they key is to reduce uncompensated risk by digging deeper into the data that is available on companies and their operations.”

NEXT: Other outlook opinions 

One of the more unique arguments for how to invest wisely during periods of uncertainty came from portfolio manager Andrew Adams, with Mairs & Power, who argued that having a home-regional bias in an equity portfolio can actually be turned into an advantage. In one of the firm’s portfolios, for example, 40% of the stocks come from within Minnesota (the firm’s home state) and another 50% come from the upper Midwest region.

“One may at first think that this would represent an unnecessary concentration of risk, but it’s actually been a really powerful way for the firm to boost transparency and understanding of the holdings in its portfolios,” Adams explains. “In other words, one can really come to a deep understanding of the performance characteristics of a company by being present in its home marketplace.”

Another portfolio management expert, Janet Brown, with Fund X, highlighted the way managers are increasingly blending the benefits of active and passive management to bring greater efficiency and affordability to all parties involved in this conversation.

“One thing we can be sure about in this uncertain environment is that markets are always changing and that they will keep changing,” Brown says. “We can also be pretty confident that clients will continue to desire lower fees and will continue to desire capital preservation, even within funds that are meant to be pursuing growth.”   

Fielding a question from PLANADVISER, the experts all agreed with the idea that retirement plan participants probably aren’t going to be all that interested in bottom-up stock picking or the esoteric debate between, say, growth- and value-oriented investing. “But that doesn’t mean these issues aren’t of critical importance for DC plan advisers and sponsors,” Brown suggested. “In many cases it will be up to the adviser or plan providers to put a lot of this thinking to work on behalf of participants.” 

«