The briefing took place on May 16, 2013, and addressed enhancing retirement security for American households. According to the
Aspen Institute Initiative on Financial Security, about half of Americans have
no workplace retirement savings plan, so the briefing was an effort to impart
to policymakers “the imperative to first expand coverage in order to make
saving for retirement easier for all American workers.”
The briefing, moderated by Lisa Mensah, executive director of the Aspen
Institute Initiative on Financial Security, included the following
speakers:
Senator Tom Harkin, D-Iowa, chairman, Committee on Health, Education,
Labor and Pensions;
Congressman Richard Neal, D-Massachusetts, member, Committee on Ways and
Means;
John Adler, retirement security campaign director, SEIU;
Jamie Kalamarides, chairman and CEO, Prudential Bank and
Trust;
Judy Miller, director of retirement policy, ASPPA;
Eric Rodriguez, vice president, Office of Research,
Advocacy and Legislation, National Council of La Raza; and
Debra Whitman, executive vice president, Policy,
Strategy and International Affairs, AARP.
The Aspen Institute Initiative on Financial Security is a
policy program that focuses on solutions to help people save, invest and own at every stage of life.
Participants take 401(k) loans for many reasons, but buying
a house is among the most common, Jim Sampson, managing principal at
Cornerstone Retirement Advisors LLC, told PLANADVISER. When the housing market
is good, participants are tempted to take a loan against their 401(k) to capitalize
on the market, but Sampson said many participants do not think about the
consequences.
The big consequence, he said, is that participants must
repay loans immediately following termination from their company or risk
default. “You basically just locked yourself into an employment contract,
indirectly,” he said.
In addition, if the employee is younger than age 59, he or
she must repay the entire loan or pay income tax plus a 10% penalty tax on the
defaulted amount, according to a paper from the Financial Literacy Center
(FLC), “401(k) Loan Defaults: Who Is at Risk and Why?”
FLC conducted research based on information from more than
4.3 million total 401(k) plan participants. Of those participants, about 20%
(870,775) had outstanding loans. Of this number, about 12% (103,991, or 2% of
the total number of plan participants) terminated their employment with a loan.
For this subset, the default rate was high, FLC said—nearly 80% (83,894) of
those who terminated employment with a loan subsequently defaulted. This means
approximately one in 10 loans resulted in a default.
FLC found that those most susceptible to defaulting loans
had smaller 401(k) balances, lower incomes and little non-retirement wealth.
Wells Fargo recently reported that of the participants who take out loans, the greatest percentage are people in their 50s (34.2%), followed by those in their 60s (28.9%)
and those in their 40s (27.3%) (see “Wells
Fargo Reports Increase in Participant Loans”).
Sampson said that during educational meetings, he makes a
point of discouraging 401(k) loans and emphasizes that they can have negative
consequences like defaults. “I think we should make it a lot harder for people
to take loans on their [401(k)] plans,” he said.
Denise Preece, assistant vice president of field services
for OneAmerica, agrees that it’s very easy for participants to borrow from
their retirement plans. “So you really have to get to these folks before they
go online to request a loan,” she said.
Once participants have reached that point, she said, there’s
usually no turning back.
Preece said education about basic finances is key to dissuading participants from taking loans. Participants must be educated about creating a
budget, managing debt and simultaneously saving for retirement and a house.
When participants have access to education, they have
knowledge before they consider taking a loan, she said.
According FLC, loan defaults can be reduced by:
Limiting borrowers to one loan at a time.
Preece said in her experience, many plan sponsors are scaling back the number
of loans their plans offer because they think it sends the wrong message about
saving for retirement.
Allowing participants to repay 401(k) loans
even after a job change. FLC researchers caution, however, that this change
would likely benefit only participants who begin another job, and would also
raise administrative costs and require extra recordkeeping).
Limit the
size and scope of loans. The plan sponsor could allow
participants to borrow only 25% of their account balances instead of the
current 50%.
There is some good news when it comes to loans, depending on
how you interpret it: Preece said that according to her company's data, the number of
participants requesting a 401(k) loan compared with simply modeling a loan has
decreased. OneAmerica’s data could indicate that participants are thinking
about loans but ultimately declining them, or trying several scenarios and
choosing the best one. "Maybe people aren’t pulling the trigger as fast as they
used to," she said.
On the other hand, Preece acknowledges, this could also be
bad news because more participants are modeling loans.