Deals & People September 28, 2012

Altegris Expands Sales Team With Two Appointments

Valentina M. Glaviano was hired as director of distribution strategy, and Christopher McCool was appointed to vice president, for Altegris’ sales and consulting team.
Reported by

Glaviano, a Certified Investment Management Analyst (CIMA), has 25 years of experience in distribution strategy and management, business development, marketing and product development. She is experienced in foreseeing evolving trends in investor and adviser needs, as well as setting product, market and sales strategy to capitalize on those trends. Her background includes deep experience with a range of investment products—exchange-traded funds (ETFs), exchange-traded notes (ETN)s, structured products, collective trusts, separate accounts, mutual funds and variable insurance products—as well as alternatives.

Most recently, Glaviano was managing director, head of ETF and trade-able funds distribution for Guggenheim Investments. Earlier in her career, she held sales and management positions with iShares-Barclays Global Investors, Lazard Asset Management, Bankers Trust and Western Capital Financial Group.

For more stories like this, sign up for the PLANADVISERdash daily newsletter.

McCool, vice president, New England regional director, was most recently director of sales with Bennett Group Financial Services in Boston, where he was responsible for the successful launch of a new series of mutual funds. Before that, he held positions with Eaton Vance Distributors and Fidelity Investments.

“We welcome the addition of Valentina Glaviano and Christopher McCool to our team of alternative investment specialized consultants and know they will be integral to our continued growth,” said Dick Pfister, global head of sales and consulting for Altegris. “We’re just as rigorous in finding individuals with an abundance of passion and talent as we are in finding the best alternative investment managers for our mutual funds and hedge funds.”

 

The Markets September 27, 2012

Tail-Risk Management Integral to Investment Plan

The majority of investors view tail-risk management as an important part of their investment plans, but barriers remain for adopting risk-mitigation strategies.
Reported by

Since the financial crisis, investors have started to rethink tail-risk mitigation strategies, Niall O’Leary, head of EMEA portfolio strategy for State Street Global Advisors (SSgA), said during a webinar. Tail risk is an extreme shock to financial markets that shows up as infrequent observations in the far left tail of a return distribution. It is technically defined as an investment that moves more than three standard deviations from the mean of a normal distribution of investment returns.

Investors are not entirely confident they are protected from the next tail-risk event, O’Leary said, adding that research from the Economist Intelligence Unit on behalf of SSgA shows institutional investors think they almost always underestimate the frequency and severity of tail risk.

For more stories like this, sign up for the PLANADVISERdash daily newsletter.

According to the research, 71% of respondents think it is likely or highly likely that a significant tail risk will occur in the next year. The Eurozone crisis, prospect of recession and the slowdown in China are prominent concerns. With tail risk, however, O’Leary said the unexpected events are the ones with the most potential to cause damage.  

Research indicates significant geographical differences between institutional investors’ views of the next tail-risk events. U.S. investors predict the next event will be the global economy falling into recession (48%); the Eurozone breaking up (37%); Europe sinking back into recession (28%); Greece exiting the Euro (25%); and the U.S. slipping back into recession (23%). European investors think the next tail risk will be Europe slipping back into recession (40%); Greece exiting the Euro (32%); the Eurozone breaking up (30%); the global economy falling into recession (29%); and major bank insolvency (22%).

 

(Cont...)

According to the survey, investors have several strategies in place to protect against tail-risk events. “A number of approaches have fallen somewhat out of favor [after the crisis],” O’Leary added. Before the crisis, 81.4% of investors diversified across traditional asset classes to mitigate tail risk. Now, that number has fallen to 75.7%. Conversely, investors have increased their usage of alternative allocations such as property and commodities (57.5% before the crisis, versus 65.1% now).

Survey respondents noted the following as effective hedges against tail risk (ranked most to least effective): diversification across traditional asset classes, risk-budgeting techniques, managed volatility equity strategies, direct hedging-buying puts/straight guarantee, other alternative allocation (e.g., property, commodities), managed futures/CTA allocation, single strategy hedge fund allocation and fund of hedge fund allocation.

“Investors are concerned about tail risk … but their take-up has been slow,” O’Leary said. Survey respondents noted the following barriers in allocating to their tail-risk protection strategy: liquidity of underlying instruments (64%); regulatory adherence/understanding (54%); risk aversion (49%); transparency of underlying instruments (46%); fees/cost (42%); understanding the investment returns/persistency of returns (33%); and lack of general understanding of new asset classes (28%).

Despite challenges, things are looking up after the crisis: 73% say they believe that because of changes in their strategic asset allocation, they are better prepared for the next major tail-risk event than they were before the crisis.

“The vast majority of investors … feel that now, despite what they’ve experienced in recent years, they are better protected against downside risk going forward,” O’Leary said.

 

«