Affluent Investors Don’t Recognize Impact of Conservatism

The Merrill Lynch “Affluent Insights Quarterly” survey shows that although 66% of affluent investors know conservative investing will help them avoid losing money in turbulent times, only 25% recognize it can prevent them from seeing high rewards in stronger market conditions.   

The quarterly survey from Bank of America Merrill Lynch Wealth Management division looks at the financial priorities and concerns of affluent Americans (those with a minimum of $250,000 investable assets).  The clearest continuing trend the survey picked up on is the redefinition of “retirement.” Eighty-four percent of Baby Boomers (age 46-64) believe their retirement will differ from that of their parents.   

The differences from today’s near-retirees and previous generations are abundant. The Baby Boomer generation plans to be much more active in retirement (86%), have a better standard of living (72%), and keeping working to remain active and engaged (70%).  When asked what word best describes their vision of retirement, 35% said “freedom,” 31% said “opportunity,” and 21% said “relaxation.”

Want the latest retirement plan adviser news and insights? Sign up for PLANADVISER newsletters.

Gender Differences 

The survey gave serious consideration to the differences between male and female investors as well.  Sharon Oberlander, Managing Director and Merrill Lynch Wealth Management Adviser with The Oberlander Group in Chicago, said from her experience as an adviser, while both men and women would equally see “freedom” in retirement, she thinks that mostly women would give the “opportunity” description, whereas mostly men would pair “freedom” with “relaxation.”   She said the opportunity women are likely to be referring to is philanthropic work and that non-profit organizations should look to this demographic as a valuable resource.

Another difference between the genders is how much they’re concerned about the “big issues” in retirement: 70% of women are concerned about rising health care costs and expenses, whereas 57% of men share that concern.  Sixty-three percent of women are concerned about ensuring retirement assets last throughout a lifetime, where 52% of men are concerned.  Lyle LaMothe, Head of U.S. Wealth Management, said women are generally more aware of overall household finances.  While men may be more comparable to a CIO, he said, women typically have the more all-encompassing perspective of a CFO.  It is critical to address the needs of both genders and develop a portfolio in which everyone is comfortable, Oberlander added.   

Lessons from Retirees 

The “Affluent Insights Quarterly” survey asked retirees what would be the most important piece of advice they would give their 30-year-old self.  Thirty-four percent said to work with a financial adviser or to work with one earlier in life, 27% said to take a more hands-on approach to their portfolios, 19% said to account for long-term expenses, and 14% said to better manage debt.Additionally, 78% of retirees said financial planning should begin in your 30s, and 57% said it should begin as early as your 20s.

The reason this early start is a good idea, said Andy Seig, Head of Retirement Services, is because time is the best thing to have when planning for retirement; there is nothing stronger than the compounding that can take place over decades. Seig and LaMothe are most concerned by the survey’s findings that 59% of 18-34 year-old investors (mean age of 31) described themselves as conservative. And even though 13% of the 1,000 affluent investors surveyed fell into this age range, the small sample is still statistically significant, LaMothe added.  Since younger investors, both affluent and those with fewer assets, began investing in such turbulent times, the fear among financial advisers is that this conservative mindset will be hard to shake.

Financial Advisers Play Important Role 

Two-thirds of the non-retirees surveyed said that working with a financial adviser has given them confidence in their ability to meet long term financial goals. Affluent retirees were asked what was the most valuable piece of advice they received from an adviser.  Sixty-percent said proper asset allocation was most important, 22% said calculating how much they would need to meet their standard of living, and 18% said how to incorporate Social Security into retirement planning.

Frequency of communication continues to climb in popularity, the survey found.  Forty-two percent of affluent Americans speak with their adviser quarterly, 28% monthly, 21% twice a week or less, 7% weekly and even 2% daily.   They survey also found that 60% of investors have been working with the same adviser for six years or more.  Oberlander said the tenure of the relationship has a direct effect on confidence.  A conversation that encompasses all aspects of a person’s finances is intimate, she said, and added that once it takes place, it’s likely to form a relationship that can last a lifetime.   

 

IMHO: Making a List

Believe it or not, PLANADVISER Magazine is five years old this year.

 

As such, we wanted to commemorate our fifth anniversary by recognizing as “legends” five individuals who had made a “significant personal impact to the retirement plan industry and the advisers who support it”.

Now, perhaps you think that would be easy—but I can promise you it’s harder than it looks.  And over the past several weeks we have gone through our list—moving some off, bringing others on, and “sleeping on it” more nights than you might think.

Never miss a story — sign up for PLANADVISER newsletters to keep up on the latest retirement plan adviser news.

First off, we limited the list to five individuals (for five years), and we also tried to focus in on the past five years.  Limiting the list to five was hard enough (certainly once we got started), but trying to focus in on the period since we launched the magazine created an even more daunting task.  Sure, it was “only” five years ago, but it’s amazing how much has happened during that time.  That was the year the Pension Protection Act was signed into law, after all, not to mention the year that the first wave of revenue-sharing lawsuits was filed, and the year that the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), responding in the aftermath of the mutual fund trading scandal, introduced rule 22c-2.  In fact, the cover story of the first issue of PLANADVISER was titled simply, “Now What?”.

When it came to compiling that list, however, while some names were, IMHO, obvious, some were perhaps “too” obvious.  There are those who have had an impact, albeit a controversial one, while others have arguably had an impact, but one that is softer, quieter, or perhaps simply not as pervasive as others.

The discipline of a finite list forces you to make tough choices, but it also inevitably leaves you wanting to create a list that is longer, and perhaps more inclusive, if only to give full recognition to the many professionals who have had—and continue to have—that “significant personal impact.”  That said, we have chosen five individuals. 

They come up in conversation with advisers all the time, and for good reason.

They are people we have watched and are watching—and people who bear watching in the years to come.

They are, quite simply, legends—and tomorrow we’ll “introduce” them to you.

===================================

The PLANADVISER “legends” will be featured in the fifth anniversary issue of PLANADVISER and will be honored at our annual Awards for Excellence celebration in New York City on March 24.  At that event, along with sister publication PLANSPONSOR, we will also be honoring our Retirement Plan Advisers and Adviser Teams of the Year, as well as our Plan Sponsors of the Year, as well as other retirement industry luminaries. 

«

This website uses cookies to improve visitors' experience. You may continue to use the site as normal if you agree to the use of cookies. This site is published by France Media Inc. To read our privacy policy, click here.