Advisory Council Considering Lifetime Participation Notices

The Department of Labor (DOL) announced its Advisory Council on Employee Welfare and Pension Benefit Plans (also known as the ERISA Advisory Council) will hold a meeting May 27–29, 2015.

The purpose of the meeting is to study model notices and plan sponsor education about lifetime plan participation and disclosures for pension risk transfers.

A 2015 ERISA Advisory Council meeting notice from DOL explains that the 2014 Council found “there are numerous considerations participants should weigh when deciding what actions to take with their accumulated retirement savings upon termination of employment at job change or retirement. In making these decisions, participants certainly would benefit from objective, timely information.” The Council heard that many plan sponsors would like to provide balanced information to their employees to help them make informed decisions, yet there is uncertainty as to what is permissible for them to communicate. To that end, the Council felt that the DOL can assume an important role in communicating clear, concise and objective information in this area.

Never miss a story — sign up for PLANADVISER newsletters to keep up on the latest retirement plan adviser news.

The 2015 Council intends to provide the DOL sample participant model notices/communications for its consideration.

The Council would like to hear recommendations related to the drafting of model notices concerning lifetime participation in Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) plans. Some of the questions that the Council will explore include:

  • What information should be included in such notices?
  • At what points in one’s career should notices be provided?
  • If provided at multiple times in a participant’s career, should notices differ in message and content?
  • In what format should notices be delivered?
  • What mediums of communication should be considered beyond model notices?
  • How long should notices be?
  • Should notices be personalized for the individual? If so, what elements should be in the notices and what challenges does this pose from a data perspective?
  • How should these notices coordinate with other required or supplemental communications a participant receives?

The Council would also like to hear recommendations related to outreach materials the DOL can provide to plan sponsors about the topic of innovative plan features that may encourage lifetime participation.

  • What format should be used? FAQ? Tip sheet? Case studies? Other?
  • What plan features should be highlighted?
  • How should the DOL balance the desire to communicate innovative ideas without specifically endorsing any specific feature?

The 2015 ERISA Advisory Council notice also explains that the 2013 Council conducted a comprehensive study of the defined benefit plan risk transfer process. The 2013 Council report included, among other things, recommendations regarding the information needed by plan participants involved in risk transfer transactions. For lump-sum risk transfers, the 2013 Council recommended lump-sum election windows be limited to no less than 90 days, and that disclosures should include “relevant information to enable a participant to make an informed election,” including the potential impact of tax penalties, whether an early retirement subsidy is included in the lump sum, and a comparison of the lump sum to other benefits under the plan.

The 2015 Council will supplement the work of the 2013 Council by focusing specifically on the information that participants need to make informed decisions when faced with lump-sum risk transfers and insurance annuity risk transfers, and best practices for plan sponsors in communicating that information. More information is here.  

Organizations or members of the public wishing to submit a written statement may do so by submitting 30 copies on or before May 20, 2015. Statements deemed relevant by the Advisory Council and received on or before May 20 will be included in the record of the meeting and made available through the DOL’s Employee Benefits Security Administration (EBSA) Public Disclosure Room, along with witness statements. Information about how to submit statements is here.

Combined Human and Robo Advisers Show Promise

A report from Charles Schwab finds working-age Americans are warming to financial advice that is delivered through a combination of personal interaction and technology tools.

Fully nine out of 10 Americans view technology as “more of a life necessity than a distraction,” Charles Schwab finds in a new survey report, “Man and Machines,” and this thinking applies directly to financial advice and the challenging process of planning for a successful retirement.

Schwab identifies increasing trust and passion for technology across generations in the United States, especially when it comes to dealing with daily financial tasks and managing money for the long term. While the data set focused on several thousand affluent consumers, the findings are telling for the wider investment advice marketplace—in part because affluent investors are often cited as favoring personal adviser relationships over technology.

Never miss a story — sign up for PLANADVISER newsletters to keep up on the latest retirement plan adviser news.

In the sample of affluent investors, just over half (54%) said they prefer to rely on technology for problem solving, including for financial issues and plan-making, while 46% still favor interactions with professionals or people they know or to whom they are referred. Notably, the report finds age “is not a defining factor in how people approach the use of technology.”

While the majority want technology to play a role in financial and general decisionmaking, when asked to choose between relying on only a financial adviser or only a computer algorithm for managing their portfolios, two-thirds (66%) of all respondents say they still prefer the human touch. Generation X is just as likely as Millennials to prefer a portfolio based on a computer algorithm, at 40% each, versus only 30% of Baby Boomers and 24% of the Silent Generation. (See “Finding a Middle Ground in Robo-Adviser Debate.”)

Charles Schwab’s study also found that Gen Xers appear to be even more plugged in than Millennials when it comes to investing and portfolio management. Gen X is more likely to rely on technology when trading stock and when creating or maintaining a financial plan, for example, while Millennials appear to be seeking alternatives to technology. Millennials are more likely than any other generation to “feel relief from leaving their devices at home when vacationing,” and they are more likely to turn toward familiar sources, such as their parents, instead of seeking answers online for financial matters.

“We’ve come to accept as fact that Millennials are hyper-focused on using technology and the Internet for all their needs, but it’s clearly more complicated than that,” says Naureen Hassan, Charles Schwab executive vice president and head of the Schwab Intelligent Portfolios, an automated investment advisory service launched this year by the firm.

Hassan noted that, similar to other studies, Charles Schwab’s new research indicates that Millennials are far more likely than the older generations to put money that isn’t immediately needed into a savings account (38%). This figure is only 13% for the Silent Generation, 21% for Boomers and 28% for Generation X. Hassan says Charles Schwab, like other investment services providers, is working to “find a way to get this generation started on the path to investing, and that will require more than a pure technology-based approach.”

Up Next: Common Ground Between Millennials and Gen X

The study also found that Millennials and Gen Xers “are more similar than commonly accepted,” and larger divisions are found between the two younger generations and their older counterparts, particularly when it comes to personal service. Some findings to back up the point include:  

  • Millennials and Gen Xers are less willing to pay more for personalized investment services (44% and 47%, respectively) than Boomers and Gen X (55% and 56%);
  • Millennials and Gen Xers are less likely to want to discuss investing strategies with a professional (49% and 48%) compared with Boomers and the Silent Generation (61% and 67%); and
  • Millennials and Gen Xers are more likely to prefer to automate investing decisions (51% and 52%) compared to Boomers and the Silent Generation (39% and 33%).

Revealing a general acceptance and trust in technology when it comes to money, Charles Schwab’s study finds that a strong majority of investors across all generations and asset levels “trust that their money is safe when they manage accounts online.” But there are clear signs that trust in online interactions can vary depending on the nature of the interaction, the report continues. Although technology is the preferred mode for transactions like booking a flight (96%), getting directions (95%), researching a new car (91%) and planning a vacation (90%), some respondents feel differently when it comes to more private matters. Across the generations, the vast majority say they prefer to interact in person when dealing with a health issue (80%) or finding a date (68%), for example.

When it comes to investing, the human touch still appears to be crucial in certain situations, especially for the ultra-high net worth category—those with $1 million or more in investable assets—and Millennials. Findings that illustrate a preference for personal interaction when it comes to investing include:

  • Seventy-five percent of Millennials are more interested in talking with a professional adviser when their financial situation gets more complicated, compared with 72% of Gen Xers, 71% of Boomers and 64% of the Silent Generation;
  • Sixty-four percent of Millennials are more interested in talking with a professional adviser when they have a significant life event like getting married, having a child or dealing with a death in the family, compared with 60% of Gen Xers, 60% of Boomers and 53% of the Silent Generation; and
  • Those with ultra-high net worth are least likely to prefer automated investing (39%) or a portfolio based on a computer algorithm (28%).

Hassan adds that Charles Schwab has reached the conclusion that “there isn’t a ‘one size fits all’ answer for how people want to invest or manage their money—they will likely always want a range of services that incorporate both technology and a human touch.”

«