Advisers Cite Benefits of Working With Wholesaler Teams

A new LIMRA study finds many financial advisers prefer to do business with financial product wholesalers who work together as a team across internal and external distribution channels.

LIMRA says the purpose of its study was to better understand the adviser-wholesaler relationship and the value both internal and external wholesalers bring to an adviser’s practice. According to the LIMRA report, when advisers spoke of working with favorite wholesalers, they often referred to them as support teams, rather than “the sales desk” or “external resources.”  

Wholesaler support for financial advisers ranges from providing knowledge of their company’s products to collaborating on client needs-assessments and providing solutions to satisfy those needs. As noted by LIMRA, internal and external wholesaler roles are sometimes perceived as interchangeable, “but advisers in the survey noted their preference for who they believe is the best provider of certain wholesaler services.”

Never miss a story — sign up for PLANADVISER newsletters to keep up on the latest retirement plan adviser news.

In short, LIMRA found neither internal nor external wholesalers have an edge on service quality perception. In fact, as advisers demand more services from both internal and external wholesalers, company wholesalers who present a team dynamic reaching across both channels can increase efficiency and provide the type of seamless support advisers are seeking. 

LIMRA finds companies can choose from several strategies to design a wholesaling support model that works best for their adviser clients. Some may choose a “company dictated responsibilities” model, through which an internal person is paired with an external, and their roles are clearly defined by the company. 

“This model tends to be cost-effective for the company but lacks flexibility and does not play to each team’s dynamic,” LIMRA notes.

Next is the “team defined responsibilities” model, through which the wholesaler team decides which duties work best with their personalities. “While it allows flexibility, good communication is essential and the team would need to frequently evaluate how well the model is working,” LIMRA warns.

LIMRA next describes the “hybrid” model: “In this scenario, one person takes on the internal and external role. This model can provide an opportunity for a wholesaler to make a higher salary than an internal wholesaler could, while traveling less than an external wholesaler. In some cases, two hybrids work as a team to insure better access to advisers.”

Finally there is the “team-based wholesaling” model. LIMRA describes this model as one in which multiple internals on the sales desk partner with one external.

“This works best when an external has an expanded territory with several designated sales desk representatives,” LIMRA says. “With several internals, it's easier to manage turnover and maintain responsiveness to adviser needs.”

The report concludes the best model for a given advisory firm depends on a number of factors, such as the complexity of the products they sell and the channels where they sell them. For any model to succeed, the wholesaler team must concentrate its efforts on effective communication and providing seamless support to the adviser client, LIMRA notes.

Nine-hundred financial professionals completed a written survey, and 17 advisers participated in one-on-one interviews to develop the research. For more information, visit www.limra.com.

Report Finds ESOPs Have Outperformed S&P 500

Private employee stock ownership retirement plans (here limited to S corporation ESOPs) outperformed the S&P 500 in terms of total return per participant by 62% from 2002 to 2012, according to a study by EY.

Research by EY’s quantitative economics and statistics (QUEST) practice reveals the total return for an average S corporation ESOP participant over the decade was $99,000, implying an 11.5% compound annual growth.

Steve Smith, Employee-Owned S Corporation of America (ESCA) chairman, explains S corporation ESOPs are improving retirement readiness for workers and providing economic benefits to communities. Findings show strong and continuing growth in net assets, distributions, average account balances and number of participants with accounts, he adds. 

For more stories like this, sign up for the PLANADVISERdash daily newsletter.

“S ESOPs are a model for how to make retirement security a reality for the broad American middle class,” Smith notes. He is also vice president of the General Counsel of Amsted Industries, a manufacturer of industrial components that offers an ESOP to its employees.

The study reports between 2002 and 2012 net assets increased over 300% and the number of participants with account balances rose 165%, from 240,000 to 650,000. Additionally, distributions to participants totaled nearly $30 billion, paying more benefits per participant than 401(k)s. 

S corporation ESOPs are a type of defined contribution retirement plan established by Congress in the late 1990s, the report notes. The vast majority of U.S. companies owned by employees through ESOPs are majority or wholly-owned. Bipartisan legislation is scheduled to be introduced in the House and Senate to encourage more private companies to convert to ESOPs, according to the report.

For more information, visit www.ESCA.us.

«