HUB Expands Wealth Management Footprint with Purchase, On Pace for 70 Acquisitions

Hub’s recent acquisition of Tulsa-based Bridgecreek puts it over 60 acquisitions this year as it continues to build its footprint across asset management, retirement, insurance and employee benefits.



HUB International Limited, a full-service global insurance brokerage and retirement plan provider, recently announced it acquired the assets of Bridgecreek Investment Management, LLC as HUB International approaches 70 acquisitions by the end of the year.

Located in Tulsa, Oklahoma, Bridgecreek is an independent, boutique portfolio management firm focused on an exclusive clientele of high-net-worth individuals, families, corporations and family foundations in Oklahoma, Texas, Kansas and Missouri. Bridgecreek currently manages more than $1 billion in assets under management. Terms of the transaction were not disclosed.

For more stories like this, sign up for the PLANADVISERdash daily newsletter.

“Expanding our wealth advisory services, particularly for private clients, in our region is important as we continue to expand and provide high-value services to clients,” Travis Biggert, president of HUB’s Oklahoma and Arkansas region, said in a press release.

Bridgecreek co-founders Chuck Fuller, CEO, and Brian Carney, chief investment officer, and the Bridgecreek team will join HUB mid-America.

In a statement to PLANADVISER, Clark Wormer, HUB merger and acquisitions managing director, says that to date this year, HUB has closed more than 60 transactions and has publicly announced 44 of them. He expects the firm will close about 70 acquisitions by the end of the year. Going into the first quarter of 2023, Wormer says the firm has more than a dozen letters of intent to close on additional deals.

“Our current acquisitions help expand our business, while providing HUB employees with the tools and resources they need to continue to provide best-in-class service to our clients,” Wormer said in an email.

Earlier this month, HUB announced it acquired the assets of Priority Insurance Associates, LLC., a Scottsdale, Arizona-based, women-owned independent insurance agency with more than 30 years combined industry experience. Priority Insurance Associates provides commercial and personal insurance solutions to individuals and businesses in the region.

Shortly after that acquisition, the firm announced the launch of its Professional & Executive Risk Specialty Practice, bringing together more than 100 HUB specialists with executive liability, professional liability, tech/cyber and transactional risk insurance placement capabilities and specialized risk and claims services.

The practice will advise clients on navigating the changing risk landscape to protect their personal and organizational reputation and assets from complex insurance issues that arise from claims and litigation exposures.

Hub has also recently announced the launch of HUB Cannabis Dispensary Insurance, which seeks to streamline the way medical or recreational cannabis dispensaries secure business insurance coverage in every legal market in the U.S.

Proposed Settlement Would Cost Juniper Networks $3 million

 Juniper agreed to a proposed settlement dismissing allegations they mismanaged their sponsored retirement plan; judicial approval still required.



Juniper Networks, Inc. has agreed with plaintiffs to settle for $3 million a lawsuit brought in August 2021 under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act. The settlement was submitted in September and motioned for preliminary approval last week, although it is still subject to U.S. District Court approval. Juniper, a networking hardware company based in California, admitted no fault or wrongdoing as part of the settlement.

The case, Reichert et al vs. Juniper Networks Inc. et al., was initially brought by two participants in Juniper’s sponsored 401(k) plan. They alleged Juniper did not adequately monitor the investment options in the plan and that options provided to participants had unreasonably high fees compared to reasonable alternatives. They also alleged that Juniper did not disclose enough information to allow participants to make informed investment choices.

Never miss a story — sign up for PLANADVISER newsletters to keep up on the latest retirement plan adviser news.

In November 2021, Juniper filed a motion to dismiss. The motion alleged that the plaintiffs lacked standing to sue, since the funds with the higher fees were optional and the plaintiffs did not elect those funds. In order to sue in federal court, the plaintiff must have been injured in some way, and you cannot be injured by an investment you did not make, argued the motion. Additionally, Juniper argued that the mere existence of lower cost funds does not prove imprudence and that the plaintiffs did not provide meaningful benchmarks to which the funds in question could be justly compared.

The plaintiffs responded in February 2022, arguing they can sue under ERISA on behalf of all plan participants, and the fact they did not suffer personally from the higher fees is legally immaterial. They also asserted that the plaintiffs were harmed by plan-wide decision making.

Judge James Donato, of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, sided with the plaintiffs in April 2022 and denied the motion to dismiss. Donato wrote that the plaintiffs made adequate factual claims that should be adjudicated at trial, and they were correct in arguing they have standing to sue on behalf of the entire plan as a class under ERISA.

The parties submitted settlement paperwork on September 15, with the official motion for preliminary approval made public on November 11. Juniper will pay $3 million to cover all claims made by the plaintiffs. This amount covers legal fees and expenses, which could be as high as $1 million, at the discretion of the judge. It also includes a $15,000 award to the two plaintiffs that brought the suit and up to $100,000 for administrative costs and the cost of notifying class members. The remaining funds will be awarded to the affected plan participants.

The parties requested approval from the judge, which has not yet been given. They also requested a fairness hearing in the future to receive final approval for the settlement.

If the settlement is approved, the claims will be dismissed with prejudice and the participants will be barred from taking further legal action related to the plan. The proposed settlement also states that if the Department of Labor objects to the settlement, the defendants have a right to withdraw from it.

«

 

You’ve reached your free article limit.

  You’re out of free articles!! 

Subscribe to a free PW newsletter - get free online access!

 Don’t leave before subscribing! 

If you’re a subscriber, please login.