Data & Research March 28, 2018

Retirement Saving Less of a Priority for Women than Men

For most people, saving for retirement does not become pressing until their 40s or 50s, when it may already be too late to craft a realistic retirement income planning strategy. 

Reported by

Sixty percent of men say that saving for retirement is their top financial priority, according to the Willis Towers Watson 2017 Global Benefits Attitudes Survey. In contrast, only 44% of women say the same. Instead, women say their top financial priority is meeting daily living costs (64%) and paying off debt (57%). The survey also found that for most people, saving for retirement does not become pressing until their 40s or 50s, when other financial needs have been met.

Seventy-eight percent said retirement security is an important issue, up from 52% in 2013. Among Baby Boomers, 87% said retirement security is an important issue, and among Gen Y employees, 71% said so.

Want the latest retirement plan adviser news and insights? Sign up for PLANADVISER newsletters.

While 57% said they are confident they will have enough financial resources to live comfortably 15 years into retirement, that is down from 69% in 2015. While 54% of men think they have enough resources to live 25 years into retirement, only 39% of women share this same view.

Thirty-seven percent of workers say they will work past age 70, up from 30% in 2015. Only 26% think they will retire before age 65, down from 29% in 2015. Struggling employees—those worried about their short- and long-term finances—are feeling the greatest pressure to retire later. Sixty-six percent of this group do not expect to retire before age 70. Thirty percent of the respondents were identified as struggling.

Seventy-four percent said they will be worse off in retirement than their parents, and 68% expect Social Security benefits to be much less by the time they retire. Another 66% think Medicare and Medicaid will also be pared back. Fifty percent expect to retire from their main job but find some other form of work before fully retiring.

“Saving for retirement is a significant challenge for the vast majority of working Americans,” says Shane Bartling, senior consultant at Willis Towers Watson. “Varying financial needs make it difficult for many men and women to build a retirement nest egg.”

Pat Rotello, senior consultant at Willis Towers Watson, says with more people planning to retire later, employers need to reevaluate their retirement plans and well-being initiatives. “In fact, it wouldn’t surprise us to see more employers develop and implement financial well-being programs to help their employees achieve their retirement and financial goals,” Rotello says.

Willis Towers Watson surveyed more than 30,000 private sector employees in 22 countries. In the U.S., the survey was conducted among 4,983 people last July and August.

Compliance March 27, 2018

TPA Accused of Stealing Assets From Retirement Plans

Vantage Benefits, a TPA and recordkeeper, has already been ordered to restore funds to one 401(k) plan; now a new lawsuit accuses it of stealing funds from MBA Engineering's 401(k) and cash balance plans as well as approximately 20 others.

Reported by

MBA Engineering, Inc., as sponsor and administrator of the MBA Engineering, Inc. Employees 401(k) Plan and the MBA Engineering, Inc. Cash Balance Plan, and the plans’ trustee have filed a lawsuit against Vantage Benefits Administrators, Inc., Jeffrey A. Richie, Wendy K. Richie and Matrix Trust Company for breach of Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) fiduciary duty, as well as other charges. Vantage benefits serviced as third-party administrator (TPA) and recordkeeper for the plans.

According to the complaint, the Vantage defendants stole approximately $2,269,653.43 in retirement assets from the participants of the plans. The Vantage defendants misappropriated the plans’ assets through 35 fraudulent transfers made by Matrix to Vantage Benefits over the course of 12 months. Matrix made these transfers of plan assets directly to Vantage Benefits without any direction or authorization of any kind from MBA or the plans’ trustee.

Never miss a story — sign up for PLANADVISER newsletters to keep up on the latest retirement plan adviser news.

The lawsuit says that prior to making the fraudulent transfers to Vantage Benefits, Matrix took possession and control of millions of dollars of assets of the plans without there being any written, or even oral, agreement between Matrix and the plaintiffs or the plans. The plaintiffs allege that by holding the assets of the plans without any authorization from the plaintiffs and by making the transfers of assets of the plans to Vantage Benefits without any authorization or direction by plaintiffs, Matrix exercised authority and control over the assets of the plans and held fiduciary status as to the plans under ERISA.

The complaint states that Matrix knew that all of the 35 fraudulent transfers were made to the same business bank account held in the name of Vantage Benefits itself, and not in the name of the plans, and that the transfers depleted nearly the entire multi-million dollar account balance held in the names of the plans at Matrix. Many of the transfers used fake participant names and Social Security numbers, and the nature of the transfers violated the terms of the plans.

In addition, the lawsuit claims, “Upon information and belief, Matrix made similar transfers to Vantage Benefits of assets totaling more than $11 million from the accounts of approximately 20 other retirement plans.”

Matrix never informed the plaintiffs that the transfers were being made, never provided the plaintiffs with the monthly trust account statements it produced for the plans and never communicated at all with the plaintiffs either orally or in writing. There was never any agreement between the plaintiffs and the Vantage defendants that authorized the Vantage defendants to instruct or direct Matrix to make the transfers from the plan to Vantage Benefits. In addition, the Vantage defendants disguised their fraud from plaintiffs and the plans’ participants for nearly a year by falsifying plan participant account statements and participant-accessible website information to make it appear that participant account balances were whole and accurate.

The lawsuit is seeking repayment of the assets stolen by the Vantage defendants and “in light of the depravity of the Vantage Defendants’ fraudulent scheme, Plaintiffs seeks exemplary damages against the Vantage Defendants based on their outright fraud.”

Notably, in a previous lawsuit against Vantage Benefits brought by Caldwell and Partners, Inc., as sponsor of and on behalf of the Caldwell and Partners, Inc. 401(k) Plan, a U.S. District Court entered a default judgment and ordered Vantage Benefits and Jeffrey A. Richie to restore $10,170,452.00 for actual damages, plus interest to the Caldwell and Partners plan, and ordered them to pay $297,836.75 for attorneys’ fees and costs.

«