Advisers Can Play Key Role Boosting Voluntary Benefits

Benefits consultants play a helpful role in guiding employers through decisions involving the offering of voluntary and health benefits: Why offer benefits? Who pays? How do you educate employees?

“If you want to reduce compensation and benefits spending without leaving your workforce financially vulnerable, you may need to take a closer look at the degree of choice and value provided in your benefits package,” according to Heather Garber, vice president of voluntary benefits & technology at Hub International Insurance Services Inc. in Chicago, Illinois.

“Keep in mind that your average American today probably isn’t buying insurance outside of the workplace (aside from auto/home), employees really look to employers to provide everything they will need to protect their families.” And that’s where voluntary benefits come into play, Garber says.

For more stories like this, sign up for the PLANADVISERdash daily newsletter.

“Voluntary benefits are benefits that serve a variety of needs for employees, most importantly allowing employees to customize their employer-provided benefits to their unique needs,” Garber explains. “When chosen and packaged well, they are customizable benefit solutions to promote the overall well-being of employees, which can assist employers in attracting and retaining employees.”  Voluntary benefits are a great way to provide employees with the benefits they want and desire with little or no cost to the company.

The ability to reduce spending for employers stems from the fact that, for the more than 20 voluntary benefits that are traditionally offered to employees, “employees pay 100 percent through payroll deduction,” says Tim Weber, national business leader, voluntary benefits at Mercer in Des Moines, Iowa.

Why Offer Voluntary Benefits

Traditional voluntary options have included short-term disability, critical illness, and life-insurance policies. But employers can help their employees build a stronger financial safety net through nontraditional voluntary benefits, such as financial planning and education, pet insurance, legal plans, and identity-theft protection.

With health-care cost pressures and regulatory complexities, Weber says that employers are increasingly moving away from traditional medical plans to offer high-deductible health plans. With such plans, the ability to purchase voluntary benefits can make the decision easier because voluntary benefits can provide supplemental coverage.  Weber notes, “We see a correlation between high-deductible participation and supplemental health coverages being offered. If employees have a $2,500 deductible and the ability to cover unforeseen risks, then the adoption rate does go up.”

In addition, Garber says, “There is a highly hypercompetitive job market out there, so every company is looking for a competitive edge. We’re seeing more white-collar companies offering voluntary benefits, but they are probably using different products—for instance, a student-loan repayment plan or a high-limit critical illness plan or something similar. These companies have the same need for these plans now as the traditionally blue- or gray-collar industry did.”

Garber says, “It’s a way for employers to help ease the anxiety around the high-deductible plan with more comfort, plus employers can help employees build a stronger financial safety net through nontraditional voluntary benefits.”

Groups typically have access to richer plans than what is available on the individual market. Garber adds, “With this not only comes more competitive benefits in the plans themselves but also lower pricing and guaranteed issue underwriting. This is a major advantage to the employee.”

Benefits Offered

There are several categories of voluntary benefits today, and they are expanding to provide offerings of interest to every generation and workforce segment. According to Garber, these include benefits that are considered supplemental to major medical and core benefits (e.g., critical illness, accident, hospital indemnity, short-term disability, and life insurance); those that promote financial wellness (e.g., identity theft, legal services, purchasing programs, workplace banking and loan services, and student-loan repayment programs); and those that are geared toward enhancing employee personalization in benefit options and providing them with convenience and discounts (e.g., pet insurance, employee perks, and group auto/home insurance).

As it relates to the first category, Weber says that these “are not used to fill in an employee’s high-deductible health cost but instead to make payments for specific risks that employees can realize. There are three products that fall into that category from a health perspective: an accident plan, a critical illness plan and a hospital indemnity plan.”

Weber continues, “If employees have a high-deductible plan, they may want to buy additional coverage for specific risks that could occur. … An accident plan would pay a scheduled benefit that would help employees with whatever expenses they may have exposure to. For instance, cancer treatments would be covered under an employee’s health plan,” but ancillary expenses—such as the need to travel to the cancer center or the cost of childcare or lodging for family members—would not be. “These plans are meant to address the total risk that one could be exposed to.”

The second category relates to helping participants with financial stress or how to improve financial health. Weber says, “Often the next question I hear from employers is ‘We’ve helped employees with the risk they know about related to their core benefits, but now can you help us help our employees with their financial risks?”

Offering employees convenience and discounts is appreciated. Weber says, “We have a whole bunch of benefits that help put cash back in their pocket or give employees a chance to reduce their expenses. Our group auto/home coverage is one example.

Employers are using scale with auto insurance companies. The premiums are payroll deducted, so there is a reduction in administrative costs. We see ranges of savings from $600 to $800 a year to buy group auto coverage through an employer versus buying individually. That’s the type of benefit that is moving to the top of the list as employers are trying to help employees with their financial stress.”

In the 2017 Alight (formerly Aon Hewitt) Financial Mindset Study, survey respondents said “the extent to which I believe employers should help me obtain identity protection services” was 50%.

Ray Baumruk, employee experience partner at Alight Solutions in Chicago, was surprised that voluntary benefits services such as identity protection would rank higher, for instance, than childhood education and debt management. “When we did some qualitative analysis around this, what most people said is that identity protection connects to several things that they would want from their employer. They are worried about someone hacking into their retirement account or their paycheck, and because this is connected to their employment, the idea of having some protection overall from an identity or data standpoint makes sense. It’s connected; it’s a close link.”

Who Pays

Weber says, “In many cases with voluntary benefits, it’s essentially the employer leveraging their scale for employee-paid discounts. So, for instance, an insurance company will make a product available knowing that it’s going to be presented to a large number of employees who allow them to underwrite the risk knowing that there is potentially a pool of people buying insurance. There are also cost efficiencies because, in most cases, the employee pays for the benefit via payroll deductions. The insurance companies do not have to collect a premium from each individual. They can get the premium en masse from an employer for all of those employees.”

But Garber notes a new trend in those who pay for voluntary benefits. Traditionally, employees have paid for the premiums of these plans. However, says Garber, with the growing importance of what were traditionally voluntary benefits, for purposes of employee well-being and the reduction of employee turnover, more employers are funding the costs of these plans for their employees.

According to the 2016 Mercer National Survey of Employer-Sponsored Health, within the transportation/communication industries as an example, 74% offer voluntary benefits at no cost to employees.

Garber concurs that groups typically have access to richer plans than what is available on the individual market. With this, she says, comes not only more competitive benefits in the plans themselves but also lower pricing and guaranteed issue underwriting. This is a major advantage to the employee, in addition to the convenience of having the plans deducted from payroll. 

Educating Employees

Offering the benefits isn’t enough, however, sources say. Employees need to understand the offerings so they can make informed decisions about these coverages. Clear, concise and consistent communications are key, according to Garber. She says that people learn and take in information differently, so it’s important that employers communicate information about these voluntary benefit offerings multiple times in multiple ways. “We offer our clients several solutions—including, on-site support, online materials, email blasts, videos, and flyers—and they choose the solutions that appeal best to their employee demographic and workplace culture.

Given this, we hope that employees view this information in two or three different formats [and] present it to them in a way that they are receptive to. For example, I like to read and research information online, and during our benefit open enrollment, I read all of the information posted online. My husband, however, is more receptive to reviewing this information in short bullet points or via a video overview.”

At HUB International, she continues, “we typically follow a method of providing an overview of what the plan is, some scenarios in which it might be beneficial, and then provide a claims example so employees can see how it works. From there, they have enough information to make an educated decision on [whether] it is a good fit for them and their family.”

At Mercer, Weber says leveraging the overall benefits platform is critical. With almost every employer using enrollment technology for their core benefits, “we found that adding the voluntary benefits coverage to that enrollment platform really helps the employee understand the full breadth of the coverages that are available. We’ve found that an integrated enrollment site improves the employee’s experience and increases awareness and value of voluntary benefits offerings. Consider moving HSAs [health savings accounts] and FSAs [flexible spending accounts] after medical, and follow with accident and other supplemental health policies that can be used by employees to complement their medical plan.”

Fiduciary Concerns When Considering Managed Accounts

Managed accounts offers unique personalization catered to a participant’s needs, but are the possible fiduciary mishaps worth implementing the product?

Managed accounts are best known for their superior customization and personalization, making them an attractive option for those searching to cater their retirement portfolios based on personal circumstances. Yet, while much focus is placed on its heightened fees in comparison to other investment products, plan sponsors should note one other concern: fiduciary considerations.

In terms with both plan and participant fees, sponsors must ensure reasonable costs relative to services rendered, according to an article by Cammack Retirement. If not, employers may risk throwing themselves into a fiduciary debacle.

For more stories like this, sign up for the PLANADVISERdash daily newsletter.

Todd Lacey, chief business development officer at Stadion Money Management, explains how rapid fees associated with managed accounts can climb.

“Sometimes it comes from how they’re built. So, managed accounts that use the funds in the plan, if you take the funds in the plan and then you add an additional management fee on top of those, in order to manage the account portfolio, that can add up pretty quickly,” he says.

To combat these added fees, Mike Volo, senior partner at Cammack, suggests offering the managed account on a voluntary basis, rather than a qualified default investment alternative (QDIA) or another default option. Whereas a QDIA will automatically enroll a participant into the managed account, holding a managed account as a voluntary selection results in reduced fees for both the plan and the participant. Instead of defaulting participants into a managed account, sponsors can apply target-date funds (TDFs)—an investment alternative with lower prices but decreased personalization—as the QDIA. Then, should a participant choose to enroll in a managed account, the TDF can be reassigned.  

“An emerging solution is to default participants into a target-date fund and then based upon a trigger, either account balance or age, then that TDF is then transferred to a managed account, which will increase utilization,” he says.

As an alternative solution, Stadion Money Management offers Storyline, an investment feature focused on small plans and amplified personalization—including personal risk profiles, expectations, and goals—that applies collective investment trusts (CITs) and exchange-traded funds (ETFs) to drive prices down.

Next: The right recordkeeper with quality investment options


Also a fiduciary concern, plan sponsors should be wary of selecting a provider with only one investment option for participants. Otherwise, both Lacey and Volo note, employers may come under fire for failing to create an appropriate portfolio model for participants.

“It’s important that plan sponsors need to really understand what the participant experience is going to be, and understand what communications and how the participants are going to act with the managed account provider,” Volo says.

Adding fuel to the fire, recordkeepers may not offer a slew of managed account options, unlike normally provided in TDFs. However, this depends on the plan provider, according to Lacey.

“Depending on who’s recordkeeping your plan, there may be no managed account option available, to five or more managed account options available,” he says. “So, in some cases the plan sponsors and advisers may not have a lot of choice.”

Yet, that doesn’t mean that managed accounts won’t see more options in the future. Lacey points out how in the past, only limited target-date fund options were available when first introduced. Today, recordkeepers regularly offer multiple funds.

“So a plan sponsor, if they were with a certain recordkeeper, they would have only one target date,” he says. “And now, that’s fairly rare. Regardless of recordkeeper, plan sponsors generally have a number of TDFs to choose from. That’s probably the direction the managed account industry may move as this kind of segment matures.”

Either way, after plan sponsors understand the number of investment funds recordkeepers will provide, Lacey suggests this is the right moment for employers to explore logistics, including underlying investments, costs and more.

“They’d want to look under the hood to see what are the underlying investments used—are they the plan funds or are there other investments? What’s the cost, and what’s the participant experience associated with that managed account. And then finally, should they offer it as a choice, as an opt-in option for participants, or do they want to make it their default fund and actually default people into the managed account,” he says.

According to the Cammack report, plan sponsors will also need to measure if there are enough active and passive funds in the current investment lineup. Otherwise, as the report reads, “an investment lineup would require an overhaul before the addition of managed accounts can be considered.”

Next: Unclear benchmarking in managed accounts  

Due to the increased customization found in managed accounts, ranging from age, marital status and more, performance reporting and benchmarking are noted as cons against the investment product. According to the Cammack report, whereas TDFs and mutual funds can apply a standard benchmark, managed accounts are heavily personalized, making comparison purposes tougher for each participant.

While a fiduciary concern for plan sponsors, employers can find other measures to show proper due diligence, says Volo. Requests for proposals (RFPs), questionnaires concerning fees, investment methodology, and participation communications regarding accounts and levels of engagement can gather insight to ultimately reach expectations and goals.

“Understanding how managed accounts are being developed, how the information is being used, and how they’re using different variables like risk, family information, outside assets, etc.,” Volo says. “Oftentimes I find the managed account providers have a significant amount of data, based on their experience in managing accounts that is helpful in doing the due diligence for a plan sponsor.”

Next: Importance in educating participants

Along with all other retirement and investment features, strategies, and tools, participant education in managed accounts remains integral, and although the idea of managed accounts clicks to advisers and recordkeepers, for participants, that’s not the case.

“The bright side has been greater transparency and more information to plan participants, but the downside has been that’s more information for participants to digest, and they’re overwhelmed,” says Volo.

To avoid stressing participants with a staggering amount of information, Lacey recommends two solutions: integrating technology and one-on-one help; and keeping it clear.

“You have to keep it very simple, the managed account provider has to work very closely with the advisers and the plan sponsors, and they have to blend technology and human support to really try to get people where they’re comfortable and enrolled in the managed account,” he says.  

If plan sponsors do add a managed account as a QDIA or as another default option and find participants are not willing to add information regarding risk tolerance or personal situations, Volo proposes choosing a TDF instead to avoid paying added fees—which could then result in a fiduciary concern.

“If they’re not willing to spend a little time and provide some personal information regarding their risk tolerance and personal situation, they may be better off in a target-date fund,” he says. Because otherwise, the managed account is defaulting based upon a retirement date, but they’re paying an additional fee for that.

However, Lacey warns of possible volatility when turning to TDFs, since the personalized information can be too broad.

“One of the challenges with some of the TDFs is that based on someone’s age, it puts them into a portfolio that might be too volatile for them, and therefore they’re tendencies to sort of bail out when their account goes down, based on market volatility, is high,” he says.

Ultimately, the deciding factor concerning managed accounts depends on what a participant feels better secured with, and what provides the best outcomes.

Lacey says, “so much of managed accounts is getting investors to a portfolio that they’re comfortable with, that makes sense for them, that’s going to have a level of volatility that they’re comfortable with—based on their risk profile.”

«