Investors Increasingly Taking Up Impact Investments

Forty-four percent of financial advisers say they would be willing to accept lower returns in order to achieve a positive social impact.

One-third of institutional investors plan to increase portfolio allocations to impact investing in the coming three years, according to a survey by Greenwich Associates and American Century Investments of approximately 75 U.S. institutional investors, more than 50 professional buyers at intermediary distribution platforms, and more than 150 financial advisers that work with high net-worth and individual investors.

One-quarter of those institutions plans to boost allocations by more than 10%.

For more stories like this, sign up for the PLANADVISERdash daily newsletter.

“There is a clear—and growing—desire among institutional investors to use their investment pools to support both the financial and societal goals of participants, organizations and stakeholders,” says Greenwich Associates consultant Andrew McCollum.

Three-quarters of decision-makers for intermediary platforms and 80% of financial advisers believe client allocations to impact investments will increase in the next three years.

Even amid this growth, the study results reveal that attitudes and perceptions about impact investments vary widely, and that assets of pension funds, not-for-profit endowments and foundations, and individual investors are flowing into a category that is not yet well defined. Investors also vary in their levels of satisfaction with current impact investing efforts.

Greenwich Associates says the most striking divergence in perceptions relates to investors’ attitudes about returns. While the vast majority of study participants say they expect impact investments to deliver at least market-rate returns, 40% of corporate pension funds and 44% of financial advisers say they would be willing to accept lower returns in order to achieve a positive social impact. However, public pension funds and defined contribution (DC) plans see superior investment performance as a requirement for investment.

“The definition and best practices of impact investing will take shape and solidify as the category attracts new participants and assets,” says McCollum. “During this maturation phase, investors will benefit by working with intermediaries and asset managers willing to help educate them about impact investing and define the proper role for the category within their portfolios.”

The complete findings of the study are found in two reports “Impact Investing: Individual Investors Seeking New Opportunities” and “Impact Investing: Institutions Awaken to New Possibilities.”

Investors Preferred Passive Funds in October

Actively managed funds experienced aggregate net redemptions of $26.2 billion in October, data from Strategic Insight shows.

Net new flows to long-term mutual funds and exchange-traded products (ETPs) totaled $8.3 billion in October, according to Strategic Insight, parent company of PLANADVISER.

Active and passive strategies continued to experience divergent trends in net investments. Passive funds led demand with $34.4 billion of inflows (including $15.7 billion to ETPs), while actively managed funds experienced aggregate net redemptions of $26.2 billion in October.

For more stories like this, sign up for the PLANADVISERdash daily newsletter.

Taxable Bond funds saw the strongest demand among long-term funds, attracting $17.1 billion of net inflows. This segment has attracted $185.6 billion of net flows in the year-to-date period, a substantial increase over the $58.3 billion seen during the first ten months of 2015. Taxable Bond flows were nearly evenly split between passive ($8.8 billion) and active ($8.3 billion) strategies during October.

Active U.S. and International/Global Equity funds saw outflows of $35.9 billion in October, while index equity exposures attracted net inflows of $25.4 billion. Net outflows among active funds were driven by redemptions in large capitalization strategies.

Net deposits into Money Market funds in October totaled $6.0 billion. Taxable Money Market funds experienced inflows of $6.0 billion, while Tax-Free Funds saw minor net withdrawals of $400 million. Taxable Money Market funds have continued to experience a significant bifurcation driven by recently-enacted regulations, as government funds saw net deposits of $103 billion while prime money market funds experienced net redemptions of $96 billion.

«