Nasdaq to Acquire Smart Beta Firm

Nasdaq announced that it will acquire smart beta and passive investing specialist Dorsey, Wright & Associates LLC.

Dorsey, Wright & Associates (DWA) will add smart beta strategies to Nasdaq’s index portfolio offerings, bringing model-based investing strategies and data analytics support to financial advisers. The deal is expected to close in the first quarter of 2015.

According to the firms, DWA will increase Nasdaq’s capacity for growth in the index business across asset classes and geographies, especially in the area of index licensing. The combined group will bring together DWA’s 17 exchange-traded funds (ETFs) and Nasdaq’s 69 licensed smart-beta ETFs, which focus primarily on dividend and income strategies.

Never miss a story — sign up for PLANADVISER newsletters to keep up on the latest retirement plan adviser news.

As a result of the deal, Nasdaq Global Indexes will reach nearly $45 billion in assets benchmarked to its family of smart-beta indexes—and more than $105 billion benchmarked to all Nasdaq indexes.

“Our index business has been a strong growth area for Nasdaq over the last decade, and the acquisition of Dorsey, Wright & Associates will further cement our position as a major player and industry innovator,” suggests Adena Friedman, president of Nasdaq. “We are always looking for opportunities to expand Nasdaq’s index offering with quality products that deepen our relationships with the investing community. DWA provides a natural complement to our business and growth strategy.”

Subject to customary regulatory conditions and approvals, Nasdaq will acquire DWA for $225 million, funded through a mix of debt and cash. Nasdaq says it intends to fuel DWA’s growth strategy by accelerating product development, raising awareness of the DWA indexes and increasing the base of potential market participation through its global distribution network. The firms hope to develop products in more asset classes—including fixed income, currencies and commodities—and facilitate international expansion of DWA offerings in Canada and Europe.

“Smart beta represents one of the fastest growing sectors within the ETF market,” adds Tom Dorsey, president of DWA. “This deal will allow us to grow significantly while continuing to create products and strategies that meet the needs of our clients.”

Additionally, there are opportunities for Nasdaq technology to enhance DWA’s digitally based adviser tools, used to deliver DWA’s methodology into tactical asset-allocation models. The firms say their collaboration will create more product and service opportunities for financial advisers as the market continues to move toward model-based investing.

More information is available at www.nasdaq.com.

Nondiscrimination Testing: Good Value Add?

The complexity of testing a plan can be one way to justify higher fees, says an ERISA plan administration business development specialist.

The subject of fees continues to generate a lot of attention, according to Michael Adamson, an Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) plan administration business development specialist, consultant and principal at Evergreen Benefit Services LLC.

However, Adamson points out, a greater level of service provided can be a way to illustrate the reasonableness of higher fees. Although some members of the industry may equate reasonable fees with minimal service in order to lower what they charge to plan providers and sponsors, this is wrongheaded, Adamson feels. “Participants need services,” he says, “and the providers—recordkeepers, advisers, third-party administrators [TPAs]—need to charge a certain fee for the services they provide.”

Never miss a story — sign up for PLANADVISER newsletters to keep up on the latest retirement plan adviser news.

As long as an adviser charges fees that are commensurate with the level of service, the fees are compliant. “You have to take it on a case-by-case basis,” Adamson says. “Every company is different. Some companies like quarterly service visits to talk about the plan, advice for participants and other services.” Others take a limited approach to providing a retirement plan, so a key part of the fee question will be assessing the service level.

One task Evergreen Benefit Services performs for retirement plans is nondiscrimination testing according to the 410(b) rules of the Internal Revenue Service (IRS). 

Performing nondiscrimination testing on a plan is a complex process, Adamson says. “It’s very involved, with schedules on the Form 5500, and can be straightforward or complicated, depending on the type of plan.” Adamson says his firm tests plan data and gives the plan sponsor a precise description of the tests they performed on the plan in order to be able to draft the report that goes to the Department of Labor (DOL).  

A great deal of detail goes into this task, he says, and it varies depending on the type of compensation and contributions that go into a plan. Profit-sharing in a plan will mean a large amount of mathematical testing, Adamson says, from the sources of money, the amount of salary deferrals, the company match and profit-sharing. “It can get extraordinarily complex,” he say. “How much can you give to various individuals without discriminating against non-highly compensated employees?”

Testing the Data

Among the most complex of plan tests is the average benefits test. Adamson says the data must pass certain tests, and the plan sponsor may have to make adjustments to the contributions in the plan. “So you test data using all the allowable methods permitted by the IRS,” he says, “and that’s when you get into a lot of mathematical calculations. You are comparing the amount of contributions you’re contributing to non-highly compensated versus the highly compensated employees. It’s volumes of mathematical information.” 

Even safe harbor 401(k) plans that are not subject to nondiscrimination tests must still be tested for 410(b) coverage, Adamson says, and can require lengthy and time-consuming testing.

The work of nondiscrimination testing can be set forth on the invoice so plan sponsors understand what goes into it. The task will require different fees depending on the type of plan, Adamson says, whether safe harbor or profit-sharing. Each plan will need a different number of hours, but the data used in testing has to come from the plan sponsor, which potentially can generate more fees. “When we place a request for the data, if we don’t get a timely response or we receive incomplete information, then we have to go back to the plan sponsor and re-request it, which takes up more time,” he says.

Adamson uses billable hours to set fees, with a best-guess estimate for certain services that details the amount of service rendered. “When the invoice comes out, the client has a full understanding of how much service is given,” he explains. The prearranged fee comes with the understanding that if additional services are rendered, there will be additional fees. “It is similar to working with a  CPA or an attorney,” he says. “If they incur additional billable hours, we let them know there will be additional fees.”

«