Employee benefits law firm Groom Law Group expanded its pension plan funding and restructuring practice with the hire of Joshua Shapiro as a senior actuarial adviser.
John McGuiness, executive principal at Groom, says the plan
funding and restructuring practice works with defined benefit pension plans facing financial difficulties—whether single employer,
collectively bargained, or multiemployer plans.
“We are sure Josh’s expertise, from single employer plans to
the recent multiemployer funding legislation, will prove particularly valuable
with respect to our work for defined benefit plans and their stakeholders,” he
notes, adding that now is a challenging time to run a pension plan of any type, healthy or otherwise.
Before joining Groom, Shapiro spent five years as the deputy
director for research and education at the National Coordinating Committee for
Multiemployer Plans (NCCMP). In that role, he was a
principal member of the team that spearheaded a legislative effort that
resulted in passage of the Multiemployer Pension Reform Act of 2014. Prior to
his work at the NCCMP, Shapiro worked as an actuary at a number of actuarial consulting
firms working with pension plans.
Shapiro is a fellow of the Society of Actuaries, a member of
the American Academy of Actuaries, and an enrolled actuary.
More information about Groom Law Group is available at www.groom.com.
By using this site you agree to our network wide Privacy Policy.
A
hardy banking industry, strong health care services and solid economic
performance have kept Switzerland’s retirement system at the top of Natixis’
2015 Global Retirement Index.
The annual Global Retirement Index survey conducted by
Natixis provides a telling snapshot of the relative performance of the world’s
retirement systems, broken down by workers’ ability to meet expectations, needs
and ambitions around long-term financial health.
Like Switzerland, Natixis finds other countries in the top
10 this year share three important characteristics—a well-developed and growing
industrialized economy with a strong financial system and effective
regulations; public policies that provide broad access to health care and other
social services; and substantial public investment in infrastructure and
technology.
“Given these factors, it is not surprising that eight of the
10 highest-ranking countries are located in Northern Europe,” Natixis explains.
“New Zealand and Australia are the two non-European countries to reach the top
10 due in large part to mandatory retirement savings schemes. Australia’s
Superannuation Guarantee system and New Zealand’s voluntary KiwiSaver
demonstrate that security for retirees begins well before the date an
individual actually retires.”
Despite relatively high tax burdens, the Northern European
countries that comprise the largest share of the top 10 also rank highly in per
capita income and demonstrate a narrow or improving gap in income equality
across their citizens, Natixis says. Like Switzerland, number-two ranked Norway
also provides universal health care to citizens and has a sound banking and
financial system.
Where does the United States rank on the list? Not as high
up as industry practitioners might expect given the nation’s global influence.
For the second year in a row the
world’s second-largest democracy achieved 19th place on the global retirement
readiness ranking. Among other challenges like income inequality, Natixis finds
retirement success in the United States is hampered by its strained health care
system, which is improving on some measures but still underperforms care
delivery in the Scandinavian countries and other parts of Europe.
Apart from the direct labor and economic factors influencing
retirement planners, Natixis says health care significantly impacts the Global
Retirement Index results. Researchers say the quality of a nation’s health care
and the physical wellbeing of its population are key contributors to widespread
retirement readiness.
“Each of the top 20 performers in the 2015 index have modern
health care systems, which include high levels of physicians per capita,
sustainable health expenditure per capita and high life expectancy,” the survey
report suggests. “The worst performing countries in the 2015 index lack modern
infrastructure and have non-existent or underdeveloped health care systems.”
For the third year, Austria ranked highest in health care
effectiveness, followed by Germany and France. Despite having the world’s
highest health expenditure per capita, Natixis says life expectancy in the U.S.
has actually declined slightly. In addition, the U.S. health system is
constrained by high demand and limited capacity of beds and physicians per
capita, causing concern for retirees.
Looking more deeply at the U.S. data in this year’s survey report,
Natixis says a persistent budget deficit and high levels of government debt
continue to create headwinds for widespread retirement success. Coupled with
increasing tax pressure, these factors have largely overshadowed improvements
in other financial indicators coming out of the most recent financial crisis.
“In fact, the U.S. banking industry has improved its loan
quality as the default ratio dropped to 2.3% from 3.9% last year,” Natixis
observes. “Moreover, inflation had decreased from 3.1% to 2.07% by mid-year and
then dropped under 2% for the remainder of 2014. With unemployment on the
decline and revived economic growth on the horizon, expectations of a rise in
interest rates in 2015 are high.”
Natixis finds this is likely good news for U.S. retirees
purchasing an annuity and those relying on fixed-income investments to fund
their retirement goals—though market volatility resulting from interest rate
policy changes could spell short-term trouble. Despite having one of the
highest income per capita ($54,000) levels, the United States continues to rank
low for income equality relative to other developed economies, Natixis finds.
This could be a potential explanation for a comparatively low life expectancy
despite the world’s highest health expenditure per capita, the report
observes.
Another key finding from this year’s analysis is that the
role of the financial advisory community has never been more critical, as noted
by David Lafferty, the chief market strategist with Natixis.
He tells PLANADVISER that, as investors around the world
look to ease the burden of funding retirement, financial advisers are in a
unique position to step forward to help clients set clearer goals and establish
more specific plans for both accumulating retirement assets and turning savings
into a reliable income source in retirement.
“Our research identifies that helping clients to more
clearly define retirement goals and expectations on retirement income is among
the key trends that are shaping today’s advisory practices,” the survey report
explains. “While they cannot resolve the deep structural challenges some
governments face, financial advisers are in a position to drive demand for
investing strategies that will empower individuals with greater control of
their own financial security and deliver durable portfolios that can withstand
market fluctuations over time.”
Natixis says its previous research reveals two-thirds
(66%) of investors agree a traditional approach that relies only on stocks and
bonds is no longer the best way to pursue investment returns. And at the same
time, only 38% of financial advisers now deem conventional portfolio strategies
(i.e., a diversified 60/40 portfolio of equity and fixed income) as the right
solution.
Instead, top advisers are offering goal-based investing
programs to their clients. As Natixis observes, this approach places the
emphasis on what an individual needs to save to meet specific goals, rather
than simply trying to outperform “an irrelevant benchmark.” Nearly seven in 10
advisers globally say they encourage clients to have a target return that is
independent of the market, Natixis finds.
The Natixis Global Retirement index incorporates 20
performance indicators, grouped into four thematic sub-indices, which have been
calculated on the basis of reliable data from a range of international
organizations and academic sources and taking into account the particular characteristics
of the older demographic retiree group, in order to assess and compare the
level of welfare in retirement in different countries around the world.
More information about how to obtain the 2015 report is
available here.