For more stories like this, sign up for the PLANADVISERdash daily newsletter.
Appellate Court Denies Rehearing of Kraft Fee Suit
The allegation against Kraft Foods was in relation to recordkeeping fees paid and its decision to unitize its company stock fund.
In April, the appellate court reversed a district court’s grant of summary judgment to Kraft, finding “that the record reveals a genuine issue of material fact as to whether defendants breached the prudent man standard of care by failing to make a reasoned decision under circumstances in which a prudent fiduciary would have done so.” The case was sent back to the district court for further proceedings (see “Appellate Court Sends Back Kraft Fee Case“).
Last week, industry groups sent a friend of the court brief, urging the 7th Circuit to rehear the case (see “Groups Urge Court to Review Kraft Fee Case Ruling“). They argued that the unitization and recordkeeping fee rulings conflict with decisions of the Supreme Court and the 7th Circuit, and subvert basic objectives of the fiduciary duty provisions under ERISA.
You Might Also Like:
ERISA Advisory Council Approves 3 New QDIA Recommendations
Mapping State Retirement Programs
Mercer: Trump, New Congress Will Likely Continue Bipartisan Work to Expand 401(k) Coverage
« Retirement Plan Tax Benefits Decreased Household Stock Ownership