ERISA Advisory Council to Review Audit Rules and Financial Reporting Model

The 2010 ERISA Advisory Council will study whether the audit requirement and financial reporting model contained in the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) §§ 103 and 104 provide the protections to plan participants and beneficiaries that Congress originally intended.

An Advisory Council Issue Paper said the objective of the study is to identify what actions, if any, the Secretary of Labor may take with respect to ERISA’s audit requirement and financial reporting model to improve the Department of Labor’s oversight of employee benefit plan audits in order to enhance retirement security in the United States. The council intends to study how auditors work with plans to comply with ERISA § 103, the advantages and disadvantages of the audit requirement, the current financial reporting model under § 103 of ERISA, whether that model can and should be modified, and to what extent, if any, it should be modified.  

The study will include a review of the applicability of limited-scope audits.  

Want the latest retirement plan adviser news and insights? Sign up for PLANADVISER newsletters.

The council’s recommendations will focus on the types of guidance or regulations that the Secretary should consider with respect to ERISA’s audit requirement and financial reporting model. Depending on its findings, the council might recommend, among other things, that the Secretary seek enhanced statutory authority to prescribe a new reporting model (i.e., accounting standards or GAAP), prescribe revised or new audit and auditor standards for employee benefit plans, or both.  

The Issue Paper pointed out that at the time ERISA was enacted, the most common retirement plans were defined benefit pension plans, and defined contribution plans have increasingly become the preponderant model for today’s workforce. 

In addition, the Council noted:

  • Plans in 1974 did not operate in the computerized, automated environment and varied structures that exist today.
  • They rarely invested in sophisticated, alternative investments or other complex financial products that are commonplace in the current markets;
  • The types and structures of institutions holding plan assets have also become more complex over the years; and
  • Both Generally Accepted Auditing Standards (“GAAS”) and Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“GAAP”), as they apply to employee benefit plans, have changed since 1974.

The Council said these changes warrant a review of ERISA’s auditing requirements and financial reporting model. 

 

GOP Weighs In on Administration’s Retirement Proposals, Annuity RFI

The House GOP Savings Recovery Solutions Group wrote to Labor Secretary Hilda Solis and Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner to oppose proposals that would affect private-sector defined contribution retirement plans.

The letter noted that in the Annual Report of the White House Task Force on the Middle Class, Vice President Joseph Biden discussed at length the creation of guaranteed retirement accounts (GRAs), which would provide for protection from “inflation and market risk” and potentially “guarantee a specified real return above the rate of inflation.” The GOP asserted: “Proposals to undermine individual retirement savings plans could make it more difficult and costly for employers to offer these voluntary plans, ultimately resulting in fewer Americans being able to save for retirement.”

The letter said the group opposed “any effort to ‘nationalize’ the private 401(k) system, or any proposal that would dismantle or disfavor the private 401(k) system in favor of a government-run retirement security regime.”  

Want the latest retirement plan adviser news and insights? Sign up for PLANADVISER newsletters.

The letter also addressed the Departments of Labor and Treasury’s request for information regarding the annuitization of 401(k) plans through lifetime income options. The Group said it appreciates the departments seeking guidance and information from all parties and stakeholders in advance of regulatory activity, but strongly urged that the departments not proceed with any regulation in this area before they have carefully and thoroughly considered all of the information received.

More specifically, the Group urged that the departments take no action to mandate that plan sponsors include a lifetime income or annuitization option if they choose to offer a 401(k) plan to their employees, or that beneficiaries take some or all of their retirement savings in such an option.  

John Kline (R-Minnesota), the top Republican on the House Education and Labor Committee and a member of the Savings Solutions Group, said in a statement: “Proposals to make 401(k) savings plans less valuable for workers and more cumbersome for employers would take us in exactly the wrong direction.” 

«


G&LR plays a major role in the intellectual life of the American GLBT community. Many readers tell us that we’re the only publication around in this digital age. Check out the Current Issue
Read Here's My Story Essays Make a DonationClose