Never miss a story — sign up for PLANADVISER newsletters to keep up on the latest retirement plan adviser news.
Compliance May 18, 2010
Court Turns Down Kraft Request for Court Fees
A federal judge has refused a demand from Kraft Foods Global Inc. to order plaintiffs in a 401(k) lawsuit to pay $212,000 the company incurred defending the case.
Reported by Fred Schneyer
U.S. Magistrate Judge Sidney I. Schenkier of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois issued the ruling after Kraft asked for the money to cover court reporter and copying charges.
Schenkier accepted plaintiffs’ arguments that the litigation costs issue was governed by Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) Section 502(g)(1), which allows a judge discretion in awarding lawyer fees and costs.
Schenkier earlier threw out the participants’ suit that alleged the company violated ERISA by paying millions of dollars to the plan’s recordkeeper (see “Kraft Excessive Fee Case Thrown Out”).
You Might Also Like:
Verizon Settles 401(k) Complaint for $30M
The agreement is still pending court approval but would end 7-year court case.
Costco Agrees to $5.1M ERISA Case Settlement
The agreement, in which Costco admits no wrongdoing, also includes mandatory changes to the plan’s fee management process.
Principal Defeats Guaranteed Investment Contract Lawsuit in District Court
At the heart of the complaint were guaranteed investment contracts, a type of group annuity contract sold to retirement plans, issued by Principal to ERISA-covered retirement plan participants.
« Commonwealth Releases Latest Version of Contact Management System