IRS Sets Benefits Limits for 2010

The Internal Revenue Service has announced cost of living adjustments applicable to dollar limitations for pension plans and other items for Tax Year 2010. 

The limitations that are adjusted by reference to Section 415(d) of the Internal Revenue Code will remain unchanged for 2010 because the cost-of-living index for the quarter ended September 30 is less than the cost-of-living index for the quarter ended September 30, 2008, the IRS explained.

Effective January 1, 2010 the limitation on the annual benefit under a defined benefit plan under Section 415(b)(1)(A) remains unchanged at $195,000. For participants who separated from service before January 1, 2010, the limitation for defined benefit plans under Section 415(b)(1)(B) is computed by multiplying the participant’s compensation limitation, as adjusted through 2009 by 1.0000.

Want the latest retirement plan adviser news and insights? Sign up for PLANADVISER newsletters.

The annual additions limitation for defined contribution plans under Section 415(c)(1)(A) remains unchanged for 2010 at $49,000. The limitation under Section 402(g)(1) on the exclusion for elective deferrals described in Section 402(g)(3) also remains unchanged at $16,500.

The annual compensation limit under Sections 401(a)(17), 404(l), 408(k)(3)(C), and 408(k)(6)(D)(ii) remains unchanged at $245,000, and the dollar limitation under Section 416(i)(1)(A)(i) concerning the definition of key employee in a top-heavy plan remains unchanged at $160,000.

The limitation used in the definition of highly compensated employee under Section 414(q)(1)(B) remains unchanged at $110,000.

The dollar limitation under Section 414(v)(2)(B)(i) for catch-up contributions to an applicable employer plan other than a plan described in Section 401(k)(11) or Section 408(p) for individuals aged 50 or over remains unchanged at $5,500, while the dollar limitation under Section 414(v)(2)(B)(ii) for catch-up contributions to an applicable employer plan described in Section 401(k)(11) or Section 408(p) for individuals aged 50 or over remains unchanged at $2,500.

For taxable years beginning in 2010, the term "high deductible health plan" as defined in § 220(c)(2)(A) of the Internal Revenue Code means, for self-only coverage, a health plan that has an annual deductible that is not less than $2,000 and not more than $3,000, and under which the annual out-of-pocket expenses required to be paid (other than for premiums) for covered benefits do not exceed $4,050.

The term "high deductible health plan" means, for family coverage, a health plan that has an annual deductible that is not less than $4,050 and not more than $6,050, and under which the annual out-of-pocket expenses required to be paid (other than for premiums) for covered benefits do not exceed $7,400.

The Internal Revenue Service explained in a press release that, by law, the dollar amounts for a variety of tax provisions must be revised each year to keep pace with inflation. As a result, more than three dozen tax benefits are subject to inflation adjustments each year, but because recent inflation factors have been minimal, many of these benefits will remain unchanged or change only slightly for 2010.

AGI Limit Impacts

The IRS said that the adjusted gross income limitation under Section 25B(b)(1)(A) for determining the retirement savings contribution credit for taxpayers filing as head of household is increased from $24,750 to $25,125, though the limitation under Section 25B(b)(1)(B) remains unchanged at $27,000, and the limitation under Sections 25B(b)(1)(C) and 25B(b)(1)(D), remains unchanged at $41,625. 

Additionally, the adjusted gross income limitation under Section 25B(b)(1)(A) for determining the retirement savings contribution credit for all other taxpayers is increased from $16,500 to $16,750, while the limitation under Section 25B(b)(1)(B) remains unchanged at $18,000, and the limitation under Sections 25B(b)(1)(C) and 25B(b)(1)(D), also remains unchanged at $27,750. 

The deductible amount under § 219(b)(5)(A) for an individual making qualified retirement contributions remains unchanged at $5,000. 

IRA Income Limits 

The applicable dollar amount under Section 219(g)(3)(B)(i) for determining the deductible amount of an IRA contribution for taxpayers who are active participants filing a joint return or as a qualifying widow(er) remains unchanged at $89,000.  However, the IRS said that the applicable dollar amount under Section 219(g)(3)(B)(ii) for all other taxpayers (other than married taxpayers filing separate returns) is increased from $55,000 to $56,000.  Additionally, the applicable dollar amount under Section 219(g)(7)(A) for a taxpayer who is not an active participant but whose spouse is an active participant is increased from $166,000 to $167,000. 

The adjusted gross income limitation under Section 408A(c)(3)(C)(ii)(I) for determining the maximum Roth IRA contribution for married taxpayers filing a joint return or for taxpayers filing as a qualifying widow(er) is increased from $166,000 to $167,000, although the adjusted gross income limitation under Section 408A(c)(3)(C)(ii)(II) for all other taxpayers (other than married taxpayers filing separate returns) remains unchanged at $105,000. 

Details about the tax benefits changes for 2010 can be found in Rev. Proc. 2009-50.

 

AllianceBernstein Says Participants Still Bullish on Target-Dates

Target-date funds have drawn a lot of scrutiny of late, but a new survey suggests that participants still have confidence in the approach. 

In fact, the research by AllianceBernstein claims that 76% of defined contribution plan participants using target-date funds think that these funds provide better performance than a mix of investments they selected on their own would. 

That may serve to explain why 84% of what the study authors characterize as “Actives” (they enjoy making retirement savings and investment decisions and are confident about their retirement prospects) and 88% of so-called “Accidentals” (they don’t enjoy investing, don’t pay much attention to it, and are not confident in their ability to make investment decisions) said they intend to maintain or increase the amount they have invested in target-date funds over the next two years.AllianceBernstein said that “Actives” represented about 38% of the survey participants, while “Accidentals” made up the remaining 62%. 

Want the latest retirement plan adviser news and insights? Sign up for PLANADVISER newsletters.

More than two-thirds of Accidentals feel unsure about investing, and only 7% feel experienced or very experienced, according to the report. As for Actives, despite their labeling, just 39% claimed that they are experienced or very experienced with regard to making investment decisions.Ironically, while target-date funds appeal to both types of investors, AllianceBernstein said that Active investors are more likely to choose them. 

More than a quarter (29%) of Actives currently invest in target-date funds, because they are “easy to understand and will keep them appropriately invested,” according to the report.  That’s betterthough not muchthan the 21% of Accidental investors, who cite target-date funds’ simplicity and the fact that they are professionally managed as the key drivers of their decision to invest in them.  Twenty-nine percent of Actives “strongly agree” that target-date funds provide better performance than if they were to make their own selections, while 18% of Accidentals feel that strongly about target-dates. 

Still Unchanged

One thing hasn’t changed, according to the authors of the fifth annual AllianceBernstein study; the recent market turmoil hasn’t changed participants’ overall attitudes toward investingand that means that most participants still do not feel equipped to make retirement investment decisions in any market—good or bad. 

According to a press release, only 18% of respondents reported being confident or very confident that they’ll have a comfortable retirement—the lowest level reported in the five years the study has been conducted.That stands in sharp contrast to the 41% of respondents who reported being confident or very confident when asked the same question in 2007.

While target-date funds are growing in appeal, many of the survey respondents seem to misunderstand how to use them. Only about one-in-five (19%) of participants have put 80%–100% of their plan assets in a target-date fund – and nearly 60% of those who don’t use a target-date fund as a comprehensive solution state that - they don’t want to put all of their eggs in one basket by allocating 100% of their assets to such a fund.  According to the report, a full half of Actives put less than 40% of their plan assets in target-dates, slightly more than the 47% of Accidentals who make that mistake. 

AllianceBernstein asked nonparticipants if they’d mind being defaulted into a target-date fund – and more than a third (37%) of Active non-participants said they would opt out, as would more than a quarter (28%) of Accidental non-participants.  Among participants, one-in-five Accidentals would opt out, as would 16% of Active participants. 

Guaranteed Appeal?

A majority of both participants and nonparticipants find a guaranteed income target-date fund concept to be strongly appealing, according to AllianceBerstein.  But would they invest in it? Among current target-date users, 69% of Actives and 53% of Accidentals say they’d be likely to invest in a guaranteed income target-date fund, according to the report.  For participants not currently using target-date funds, the likelihood of investing is lower, 43% and 39%, respectively. 

 “This research clearly uncovers the participants’ desire for simplicity and an increased level of confidence when it comes to investing for retirement,” says Cathy Peterson, senior marketing director at AllianceBernstein Defined Contribution Investments (ABDC).  “We believe that both the financial-services industry and plan sponsors can use these findings to improve the investment solutions and communications programs offered through defined contribution plans—all with the goal of helping employees to be well prepared for retirement.” 

AllianceBernstein conducted its fifth annual Web-based survey in March. It included 1,070 full-time employees who were 18 or older. All of the participants worked for companies that offered defined contribution retirement plans, such as 401(k)s.  

“Inside the Minds of Plan Participants” is available at www.abdc.com.

«