AI Can Be Helpful for FAs—but Mostly In-House for Now

Speakers at an eMoney financial adviser summit noted that AI is most useful for wealth managers as a practice management tool, ideally freeing up advisers for more human interaction.

Technology, particularly artificial intelligence, will continue to play a role in how financial advisers work with clients and could make advice cheaper and more expansive, according to financial service leaders speaking during an eMoney Advisor LLC virtual summit on Wednesday.

“If we go back hundreds of years ago, only the wealthiest Americans had access to some type of financial advisement,” said Maxwell Lane, CEO of Flourish Financial LLC, an adviser financial products and tools platform. “Fast forward to today, and it’s a much larger swath of people.”

Never miss a story — sign up for PLANADVISER newsletters to keep up on the latest retirement plan adviser news.

When discussing the potential for technology, and particularly generative AI, to transform financial advisement, the speakers from firms including Allianz Life, Fidelity Investments and Nationwide all pointed to internal, practice management roles for AI, rather than client-facing uses. Examples of AI implementation included back-office administration, summarizing client meeting notes and identifying potential clients.

“I see more AI usage in those areas [such as back office and client identification] in the short term; long term, we will have to see,” said Judy Lee, vice president and platform consulting team lead for Fidelity Investments.

For many retirement plan advisories either working directly in wealth management or via partnerships, staffing correctly for individual advisement can be difficult—but technology, according to the speakers, may be able to help streamline client management.

Erin Tyra, director of registered investment adviser annuity distribution at Nationwide, said the insurer is building its own AI tools to “remain competitive in the marketplace” for emerging technology. One project, she said, is focused on helping financial advisers best manage and interact with clients.

“What is the best cadence for email vs. phone call vs. in-person meeting?” Tyra asked. “We are trying to develop an AI tool that will prompt our advisers to see that it’s a good time to reach out by email to Ms. Smith or this would be a good time to set up an in-person meeting with Mr. Johnson.”

If an adviser has a large book of clients, this type of outreach can be “overwhelming,” she said. The AI tools can help “make advisers better with their relationships and identifying gaps in service.”

Broadening Access

Lane, of Flourish, sees technology as not just helping wealth managers improve their practices, but continuing to lower the threshold of assets a client will need to get advice.

“There’s a real desire from financial advisers who want to help as many people as possible, but they also have to run a successful, sustainable business,” he said. “With AI, as advisers get more efficient over time … the net effect should be, if a firm can serve a $500,000 client today and that was their minimum, in the future, it’s going to be $250,000, and someday $100,000, and then $50,000 … that should allow for more Americans to have access to advice.”

Tyra, of Nationwide, noted that if advisers are going to use technology, they must really understand it and ensure it fits within their fiduciary duties and regulatory framework. Advisers should use the technology where it fits, she said, and then take the time saved to lean into the more human-centric services.

“If the technology is really good at interpreting source data, for example, can you fill that gap by learning more about clients’ behavioral financial issues?” she said. “They can tap into those areas where the algorithm cannot meet those needs and where you can bring in that human angle—really lean in there.”

A report released Wednesday by consultancy Cerulli Associates and Osaic Inc. emphasized the growing demand from investors for services beyond just money management.

According to the report, 55% of investors consider an adviser’s understanding of their financial goals, needs and risk tolerance when choosing an adviser, a larger percentage than those who consider the performance of their investments relative to the overall market (46%). That demand, according to the report, is driven by greater market volatility, the “continued decline of employer pensions as a funding mechanism for retirement” and an increasingly complex array of investment options.

Broadening Services

AI and technology may free up advisers to provide “more services like taxes or bill pay or educating the next generation,” noted Fidelity’s Lee. “All of those are going to be part of wealth management. … With technology, [advisers] will be able to pre-empt what their clients will need before they ask.”

John Helmen, head of national accounts for Allianz Life Insurance Co. of North America, agreed, noting that technology should, in time, allow advisers to lean further into their “soft skills” and work with clients on more holistic needs.

During the panel, moderator Brandon Tucker, an advisory financial planning practice management consultant for eMoney, noted that surveying has shown that financial advisers are more concerned about robo-advisers replacing their business than generative AI. The panel agreed that AI will not replace human advisers, though Lane, of Flourish, did note that generative AI is likely more threatening than robo-advice.

“I think it’s interesting that they were more fearful of robo-advisers than they were [of] AI, because I think [AI]’s much more impactful,” he said, reiterating that the “human touch” will always be needed for financial advisement.

Helmen, of Allianz, said that as AI takes on more tasks, it may lead to even more work, and opportunities, for humans.

“We all know that holistic advice is now the benchmark, but if you can use [AI] in the right way, you should be able to add more value and build a better experience altogether,” he said. “This AI revolution we are taking about is going to take time, and it’s going to be slow, but the goal here is to provide the better experience for the end user.”

Longevity, Early Retirement Pose Savings Challenge

Wayne Park, CEO of John Hancock Retirement, discusses ways the retirement industry can help workers be better prepared for retirement.

Americans will be living longer in coming years, but they may not necessarily be working longer to earn income for those additional years of living.

That’s one of the takeaways from a financial resilience and longevity report from John Hancock Retirement that draws on its U.S. retirement plan participants and a separate panel of retirees.

Never miss a story — sign up for PLANADVISER newsletters to keep up on the latest retirement plan adviser news.

According to the study, 62% of retirees surveyed left the workforce sooner than expected, both shortening their time to save in a workplace plan and extending their financial needs in retirement. While the survey showed that workers expect to work four more years than they would like to, in part to save more for retirement, the findings also showed that the choice may not fully be in their hands, says Wayne Park, CEO of John Hancock Retirement, which is part of Manulife Investment Management.

“You’d like to think people are retiring earlier for good reasons, but that’s not always the case, unfortunately,” he says. “It can be employment reasons or health issues.”

Among those who retired earlier than planned, 72% wish they had saved more before retiring, according to the study. That compared with 47% who wish they had saved more, among those who retired at their planned date.

Park says these earlier retirements, combined with longer life spans, should spur the retirement industry and employers to focus on helping people maximize their working years to save and be prepared for retirement.

Five A’s

Wayne Park

The retirement division CEO breaks down key areas of support into five “A’s”:

  • Retirement plan access;
  • Automatic plan design elements;
  • Activating participant engagement;
  • Investment alpha; and
  • Financial advisement.

On the first point, Park says, the industry must keep trying to extend employee access to tax-advantaged retirement saving plans, an area the SECURE 2.0 Act of 2022 sought to address through tax incentives and other provisions.

Second, he notes, is continuing to implement automatic enrollment and automatic escalation within those plans to get people saving, something also being supported by legislation.

The third area, however, is trickier: getting participants to engage and proactively manage their savings.

“At some point, you can’t auto-everything,” Park says. “What we see, even from our own communications, is that those [participants] that at least open the emails or have some engagement prove that they’re better off in their savings and that they certainly have a higher savings rate.”

Park says spurring and keeping engagement is a key focus for John Hancock as a recordkeeper, but also in conversations with adviser intermediaries. He notes that John Hancock Retirement, unlike some recordkeeper competitors, does not offer advisement and sees itself as “the partner of choice” for advisers in working with plan sponsors and participants.

The fourth area Park points to is giving participants a strong investment strategy, both in terms of growth and allocation catered to their personal needs.

Finally, he individual plan advisement is key not just for the wealthiest savers, but for participants of all income levels.

“It’s not something we see a lot of in-plan right now, but we hope to see increases in advice,” Park says.

According to John Hancock’s survey, about 80% of participants with an adviser said they were in a good financial situation, compared with 52% of participants without an adviser. Meanwhile, having a comprehensive retirement plan appeared to bolster financial sentiment, with 78% of those with a plan reporting a strong financial situation, as compared with 54% who did not have one.

Help, Please

Park acknowledges that those findings may be skewed because people with the means to hire a financial adviser also tend to have better financial situations. However, he believes advancements in technology have expanded the pool of people with whom advisers are working and are willing to take on as clients.

“Even if it’s not the official definition of advice, [employers] can offer some sort of help, whether it’s content, rules of thumbs or creating engagement,” he says.

Meanwhile, he believes employers are able to provide more education and guidance via tools and resources from the recordkeeper or adviser working on the plan.

Park’s five elements for helping participants certainly seem to be needed, according to the study.

When survey respondents shared their retirement preparedness across the generations, the results were low. Just 36% of Baby Boomers said they are prepared, while 27% of Millennials and Generation Z feel on track, and 26% of Generation X feels ready.

John Hancock’s survey on financial resilience and longevity was fielded in June and was made up of 2,623 John Hancock plan participants and 525 retired Americans.

John Hancock Retirement is focused on researching and solving for longevity and retirement, having this year signed a five-year contract with the Massachusetts Institute of Technology’s AgeLab for projects, including the creation of a Longevity Preparedness Index.

«

 

You’ve reached your free article limit.

  You’re out of free articles!! 

Subscribe to a free PW newsletter - get free online access!

 Don’t leave before subscribing! 

If you’re a subscriber, please login.