412(e)(3) Plans for Small-Business Clients

A 412(e)(3) fully insured defined benefit (DB) plan might be the right solution for small-business clients with stable profits. 

In a 412(e)(3) plan, each participant is provided with a guaranteed, pre-determined benefit amount that is defined by the plan document and fully insured by the purchase of fixed annuity or life insurance and annuity contracts. Because plan benefits are guaranteed, 412(e)(3) plans are exempt from the funding requirements of IRC Section 41. Any “excess” interest earnings (or dividends, if paid) over and above the life and annuity contract guarantees are used to reduce the next year’s plan contribution.

A fully insured 412(e)(3) DB plan may be a plan solution for the owner of a small business or professional enterprise who desires a large current tax deduction and secure guaranteed retirement income, according to Mary Read, national director of qualified plan marketing at Alliance Benefit Group-Pentegra. Most business owners think their retirement money will come from selling their businesses, but the recession proved that may not always be possible, Read said during a webinar about 412(e)(3) plans. “It’s a very risky plan for retirement,” she cautioned.

For more stories like this, sign up for the PLANADVISERdash daily newsletter.

The contributions to a 412(e)(3) are, by design, very large in the early years of the plan and may be less appealing as the number of plan participants increases. Introducing life insurance to fund a portion of the benefit will provide increased initial contributions and a current life insurance benefit for each participant, she said.  

Read outlined some advantages and disadvantages for business owners to adopt 412(e)(3) fully insured DB plans: 

Advantages  

  •  A fully insured 412(e)(3) DB plan can provide substantial retirement benefits without market risk;
  •  Because benefits are funded based on the contract guarantees, the 412(e)(3) fully insured DB plan can provide a maximum current tax-deductible contribution for the business;
  •  There is no full-funding limitation under IRC Section 404(a)(1)(A);
  •  No quarterly contributions are required; and
  •  There can be no under-funding because contributions are based on the guaranteed provisions of the level premium contracts. 

Disadvantages  

  •  It requires large contributions that must be made each year;
  •  No policy loans are available;
  •  There is no flexibility in contribution allocations; and
  •  It must be funded exclusively through annuity and life insurance contracts.   

Read said she has seen an increase in 412(e)(3) DB plans in the past several years, a trend that she attributes to uncertainty about the economy and stock market. “This is a place where they can feel comfortable, feel secure,” she added.

Business owners may be concerned about what happens if they have a bad year and cannot keep up with the 412(e)(3) DB plan. Read said she would not recommend that a business owner with highly fluctuating profits enter into one of these plans. However, she said, “This is not pension prison,” meaning there are always ways to get out of the plan.

If the business has a bad year, the plan can be amended to cut back the formula and reduce the company’s contribution obligation. Another option is switching from a fully insured 412(e)(3) DB plan to a traditional DB plan. And if things are really bad, the plan can be terminated.

The best candidates for 412(e)(3) plans are small companies (with less than five employees) that have high, stable profits, and an older owner with younger employees. In addition, the ideal candidate is an owner seeking high tax deductions who has the ability to pay ongoing contributions and is willing to make a five- to 10-year commitment, Read said. 

IRS Updates DB Forms and Documents

The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) has been updating a number of documents and forms for defined benefit (DB) plans.

On February 1, the IRS began accepting applications for opinion and advisory letters for preapproved DB plans for the second six-year remedial amendment cycle. Plan sponsors and practitioners should use Form 4461-A (revised in March 2013), Attachment 1-A, and Form 8717-A (revised in February) when submitting a preapproved DB plan to the IRS.

In April, the IRS also updated information for their Defined Benefit Listing of Required Modifications and Information Package (LRM). This information package contains samples of plan provisions that have been found to satisfy certain specific requirements of the Internal Revenue Code and the 2012 Cumulative List of Changes in Plan Qualification Requirements (Notice 2012-76, 2012-52 I.R.B. 775).

Want the latest retirement plan adviser news and insights? Sign up for PLANADVISER newsletters.

According to the IRS, such language may or may not be acceptable in different plans depending on the context in which used. The package is to assist plan sponsors who are drafting or redrafting plans to conform to applicable law and regulations, and is designed with the intent of enabling the IRS to process and approve master and prototype (M&P) plans more quickly.

The DB LRM contains sample language that plan sponsors and mass submitters of DB M&P plans may use in drafting their plans. M&P plan sponsors and mass submitters are encouraged to use LRM language and to identify where the LRM is used in their plan documents. In addition, practitioners and mass submitters of Volume Submitter plans may find the language useful in drafting plans.

More information about the forms, as well as the forms themselves, can be found here.

«

Close

You have one article remaining.
Already a subscriber? Please log in to access without interruption.